2018
DOI: 10.1017/jpr.2018.57
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From trees to graphs: collapsing continuous-time branching processes

Abstract: Continuous-time branching processes (CTBPs) are powerful tools in random graph theory, but are not appropriate to describe real-world networks, since they produce trees rather than (multi)graphs. In this paper we analyze collapsed branching processes (CBPs), obtained by a collapsing procedure on CTBPs, in order to define multigraphs where vertices have fixed outdegree m ≥ 2. A key example consists of preferential attachment models (PAMs), as well as generalized PAMs where vertices are chosen according to their… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This construction is already used in [5,6,32,48]. The embedding holds for any m ≥ 2, but the topological description of the graph as a CTBP is used only in [32].…”
Section: Garavaglia Van Der Hofstad Litvakmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This construction is already used in [5,6,32,48]. The embedding holds for any m ≥ 2, but the topological description of the graph as a CTBP is used only in [32].…”
Section: Garavaglia Van Der Hofstad Litvakmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The above construction is reminiscent of the collapsed continuous-time branching processes defined in [GvdH18]. However, the two constructions are different as the newly born vertices in (τ l , τ l+1 ) are not allowed to reproduce in the above construction, while they are in [GvdH18].…”
Section: Branching Process Embeddingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The downside of this approach is that applications are restricted to trees, something that is not always realistic. However, in a recent paper [6] the authors shows a way of collapsing a branching process resulting in a (specific) preferential attachment network, while still being able to apply powerful branching process results. This is done for the single type case with affine rate functions, and extensions to the multi-type case seems possible.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%