From uncertain boundaries to uncertain identity: Effects of entitativity threat on identity–uncertainty and emigration

Abstract

When people feel uncertain about their national identity, they may want to emigrate from their nation. This uncertainty can arise when people are exposed to an alternative historical narrative about their own national (ingroup) origins promoted by a neighboring nation (outgroup). Drawing on uncertainty–identity theory we propose that the conditions that promote this process would include when: (a) a revised history threatens the entitativity of national identity, (b) people identify strongly with their nation, (c) a neighboring nation is numerically large enough to transform its own view into a new shared reality, and (d) a new interpretation of history is considered credible. We conducted an experiment in the context of historical disputes between China (outgroup) and Korea (ingroup) (N = 160). We measured Korean identification and manipulated a type of identity threat (valence threat vs. entitativity threat), relative group size (not salient vs. salient), and source credibility (low vs. high). Then, we measured identity–uncertainty and emigration as dependent variables. As predicted, hierarchical regression analyses yielded a significant four‐way interaction on identity–uncertainty. Simple slopes analyses revealed that entitativity (vs. valence) threat significantly increased identity–uncertainty among high identifiers when the outgroup's relative size was salient and its view was credible. Further, the elevated identity–uncertainty strengthened intentions to emigrate from the ingroup. Implications for intergroup communications and identity validation are discussed.

Extreme party animals: Effects of political identification and ideological extremity

“…This reality indicates that there are important moderators that we did not include in our original model, and which deserve future researchers’ attentions. We believe the following moderators are important for determining how political identification and identity‐based ideological extremity affect political attitudes and behaviors: political leaders’ rhetoric and/or leadership styles (e.g., Hogg & Adelman, 2013), self‐uncertainty (e.g., Hogg, 2007; Hohman & Hogg, 2011), cultural values (e.g., Harati et al, 2019), salient outgroups (e.g., Jung et al, 2018), ingroup entitativity (e.g., Jung et al, 2019), and external events affecting any and/or all these factors (e.g., global pandemic).…”

How China’s Great Bay Area Policies Affect the National Identity of Hong Kong Youth—A Study of a Quasi-Natural Experiment Based on the Difference-in-Differences Model

“…Thus, they build identification with the in-group by perceiving differences and similarities. In negative intergroup contact, threats from external groups can also enhance individuals’ identification with internal groups [ 18 ].…”

Psychological Factors of Youth Emigration Intentions: A Review of International Studies

“…Пространство психологических факторов эмиграционных намерений молодежи включает в себя и разные типы идентичности. Так, вполне ожидаемо, что выраженная гражданская идентичность имеет отрицательную связь с эмиграционными намерениями (Marrow et al, 2020) и наоборот -высокая неопределенность гражданской идентичности усиливает намерения эмигри-PERSONALITY RESOURCES AND CHALLENGES OF CURRENT TIME: NATIONAL AND GLOBAL ровать (Jung et al, 2019). Существуют исследования, определяющие роль этнической идентичности в развитии намерений международной мобильности (Agadjanian et al, 2008;Caron, 2020;Tartakovsky et al, 2017;Ye, Deng 2020).…”