Background: Negative or uninformed stuttering attitudes proliferate among the general public, and bourgeoning research has shown that such attitudes might emerge as early as the preschool years. Despite decades of research on the topic, much remains unknown about the origin of stuttering attitudes and the factors that bear on their development. Moreover, conclusive recommendations to improve attitudes toward stuttering have yet to be advanced. Purpose: This study sought (a) to objectively measure stuttering attitudes among preschool children, (b) to examine predictive factors that might account for those attitudes, and (c) to determine the effect of a new educational program on improving preschoolers' stuttering attitudes. It was hypothesized that children would hold uninformed or negative attitudes about stuttering, which would be amenable to improvement following the educational program. Children's experience with stuttering and their social cognitive skills were expected to have a positive effect on their stuttering attitudes. Other factors, such as parent attitudes and demographic variables, were expected to have little to no effect. Method: The stuttering attitudes of 55 preschoolers were measured using the Public Opinion Survey of Human Attributes-Stuttering/Child (POSHA-S/Child). Data were interpreted relative to children's demographic variables, exposure to stuttering, personal factors, and parent stuttering attitudes (obtained from 38 parent respondents). Thirtyseven children learned about stuttering and sensitive peer interactions by participating in the Attitude Change and Tolerance (InterACT) program. Their POSHA-S/Child ratings were obtained following the program, and compared to a control group. Results: Pre-post comparisons showed statistically significant improvements in stuttering beliefs and self reactions for children in the experimental group, and no significant attitude change for control participants. Prior exposure to stuttering was associated with more positive baseline attitudes, but other variables had marginal-to-negligible predictive power. iii Acknowledgements This dissertation is a culmination of the support I received from those who believed in this project and in my ability to achieve it. First and foremost, I extend deepest gratitude to my advisor, Ken St. Louis. Through his constant mentorship and guidance, I learned what it means to be persistent in the pursuit of a vision, how to be resilient in times of adversity, and that growth occurs beyond the confines of one's comfort zone. He helped me become a better researcher, teacher, and person. I am both humbled and privileged to have had the opportunity to learn from one of the "greats." I am indebted to my doctoral committee-Dr.