2022
DOI: 10.1002/zaac.202200263
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Front Cover: BF4 as source for the preparation of BF2 bridged copper(II) dimethylglyoxime complexes (Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 16/2022)

Abstract: The cover picture shows a closer look at the decomposition of the tetrafluoroborate anion (BF4‐) during the reaction of Cu(BF4)2⋅6H2O and dimethylglyoxime (H2dmg) to formally “BF2+” and 2F‐. Whereas the high affinity of fluoride anions towards silicon lead to the formation of SiF62‐, BF2 is inserted into the ligand framework to yield diverse O,O‐bidentate difluoroboron copper(II) complexes. These resulting complexes have been isolated and structurally characterized. Their molecular structures frame the magnify… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At 435 nm (ɛ m = 2471 L mol À 1 cm À 1 ) a weaker absorption maximum is visible, which previously was assigned to transitions into LMCT (ligand-to-metal-charge-transfer) states. [12][13][14] The experimental spectrum is in excellent agreement with the time-dependent (TD) DFT predicted UV/Vis-spectrum that predicted two maxima at 230 and 270 nm and several maxima of lower intensity at higher wavelengths (see the Supporting Information Sections 2, 9.3, and 9.6, Figures S49, S51-S56, and Table S15). The spectroscopic signature of 2 resembles that of 1, where the main difference is the inversed intensity ratio of the bands at 228 and 275 nm, (ɛ m = 14 474 L mol À 1 cm À 1 and ɛ m = 9244 L mol À 1 cm À 1 , respectively) caused by the different coordination modes of the ligands.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 75%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…At 435 nm (ɛ m = 2471 L mol À 1 cm À 1 ) a weaker absorption maximum is visible, which previously was assigned to transitions into LMCT (ligand-to-metal-charge-transfer) states. [12][13][14] The experimental spectrum is in excellent agreement with the time-dependent (TD) DFT predicted UV/Vis-spectrum that predicted two maxima at 230 and 270 nm and several maxima of lower intensity at higher wavelengths (see the Supporting Information Sections 2, 9.3, and 9.6, Figures S49, S51-S56, and Table S15). The spectroscopic signature of 2 resembles that of 1, where the main difference is the inversed intensity ratio of the bands at 228 and 275 nm, (ɛ m = 14 474 L mol À 1 cm À 1 and ɛ m = 9244 L mol À 1 cm À 1 , respectively) caused by the different coordination modes of the ligands.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…determined for both compounds (Figure 1) and resemble comparable structures described in the literature. [10,[12][13][14]23] Additionally, structure optimization was performed at B3LYP/def2-TZVP level, which showed good geometrical agreement with the experimental results (Figure S47, Table S26 in the Supporting Information). The structure of 2 resembles that known for nickel(II) ions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 55%
See 3 more Smart Citations