2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2007.07.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Frontal and parietal ERPs associated with duration discriminations with or without task interference

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

6
22
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 89 publications
6
22
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The insignificant variation in N1 amplitude in this study may partly due to the use of a stabilometer of low curvature that did not produce as much stance instability as unipedal stance would have. Moreover, the most appealing explanation to reconcile the paradoxical finding is that a dual task may not necessarily alter regional activation, instead altering the interactions of the frontal/prefrontal areas with other cortical regions [such as parietal (Gontier et al, 2007) and premotor areas (Marois et al, 2006)]. Of note, the older adults exhibited a stronger SL_FSM than the young adults (Figure 7A, Table 2).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The insignificant variation in N1 amplitude in this study may partly due to the use of a stabilometer of low curvature that did not produce as much stance instability as unipedal stance would have. Moreover, the most appealing explanation to reconcile the paradoxical finding is that a dual task may not necessarily alter regional activation, instead altering the interactions of the frontal/prefrontal areas with other cortical regions [such as parietal (Gontier et al, 2007) and premotor areas (Marois et al, 2006)]. Of note, the older adults exhibited a stronger SL_FSM than the young adults (Figure 7A, Table 2).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…To our knowledge, no studies have investigated alterations in information transfer for a postural-suprapostural task performed by older adults, despite the degeneration of the white matter integrity of the brain with aging (Furst and Fellgiebel, 2011; de Groot et al, 2016). Hence, it is worthwhile to characterize the differences in the functional connectivity of the frontal/prefrontal areas to other cortical regions [such as the parietal (Gontier et al, 2007) and premotor areas (Marois et al, 2006)] of young and older adults during a postural-suprapostural task.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contingent negative variations (CNVs) have been associated with the perception of short time intervals (Pfeuty et al, 2003, 2008; Macar and Vidal, 2004; Gontier et al, 2007, 2009; Le Dantec et al, 2007). Mitsudo et al (2009) found that CNVs after the presentation of t 1 were quantitatively related to the duration of t 1.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These simple observations indicate that the human brain is able to register, store, reproduce, retrieve, and compare short time intervals, which Buhusi and Meck (2005) called “millisecond timing.” Indeed, processing time intervals below half a second is important in a number of situations for human beings, i.e., for motor control, speech generation and recognition, playing music, and dancing (Buhusi and Meck, 2005). There are a number of studies that have examined interval estimation within the millisecond range, including both psychophysical (e.g., Merchant et al, 2008; see Grondin, 2001 for a review) and neurophysiological studies (e.g., Gontier et al, 2007; Le Dantec et al, 2007; Gontier et al, 2009; Jin et al, 2009; Morillon et al, 2009; Harrington et al, 2010; see Gibbon et al, 1997; Macar and Vidal, 2004; Grondin, 2010 for reviews). They have addressed issues such as the laws and properties of time perception and timing processing, the cognitive modeling of such processing, and the underlying brain structures that mediate these processes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other empirical studies, in particular dual task paradigms (e.g. Brown, 1997;Coull et al, 2004;Rammsayer & Ulrich, 2005;Gontier et al, 2007), also highlighted the important interaction between allocation of attention and interval timing performance (see Brown, 2008 for review). In particular, non-temporal tasks that tap executive functions interfere with timing and vice versa.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%