1986
DOI: 10.1002/cne.902530402
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Frontal eye field as defined by intracortical microstimulation in squirrel monkeys, owl monkeys, and macaque monkeys: I. Subcortical connections

Abstract: Intracortical microstimulation was used to define the borders of the frontal eye fields in squirrel, owl, and macaque monkeys. The borders were marked with electrolytic lesions, and horseradish peroxidase conjugated to wheat germ agglutinin was injected within the field. Following tetramethyl benzidine histochemistry, afferent and efferent connections of the frontal eye field with subcortical structures were studied. Most connections were ipsilateral and were similar in all primates studied. These include reci… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

26
207
0
3

Year Published

1996
1996
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 354 publications
(236 citation statements)
references
References 124 publications
26
207
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…These thalamic projection zones correspond to those reported for New and Old World monkeys after injections in the FEF (Huerta et al, 1986). In one galago, different tracers were injected into granular frontal cortex just anterior to PMD and PMV.…”
Section: Thalamic Connections Of Motor Areas and Prefrontal Cortexsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…These thalamic projection zones correspond to those reported for New and Old World monkeys after injections in the FEF (Huerta et al, 1986). In one galago, different tracers were injected into granular frontal cortex just anterior to PMD and PMV.…”
Section: Thalamic Connections Of Motor Areas and Prefrontal Cortexsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…They have been used in the study of auditory and vocal processing in the awake and behaving conditions for over a decade (Lu et al, 2001a,b;Barbour and Wang, 2003;Bendor and Wang, 2005;Wang et al, 2005;Eliades and Wang, 2008a,b) and necessary techniques for their handling and behavioral conditioning for auditory tasks have been established (Osmanski and Wang, 2011;Remington et al, 2012). The anatomy and physiology of the marmoset visual systems have been examined in detail for anesthetized animals (Kaas et al, 1978;Huerta et al, 1986;Krubitzer and Kaas, 1990;Tweedale, 2000, 2005;Solomon et al, 2002;Collins et al, 2005;Roe et al, 2005;Szmajda et al, 2005;Rosa et al, 2009;Yu et al, 2010;Martin et al, 2011;Solomon et al, 2011;Valverde Salzmann et al, 2012;Chaplin et al, 2013), including a stereotaxic atlas of the marmoset brain (Paxinos et al, 2012), and recently noninvasive techniques for anatomical and functional imaging have been established (Belcher et al, 2013;Liu et al, 2013;Papoti et al, 2013), thus providing a sound basis for continued study with invasive techniques in the awake, behaving animal. One key advantage of the marmoset compared with the macaque is its lissencephalic (flat) cortex.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are a number of possible anatomical pathways that could be involved, both cortical (Huerta et al, 1987) and subcortical (Huerta et al, 1986;Tian and Lynch, 1997). Given that the FEF takes part in the pro- .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%