2009
DOI: 10.1007/s11999-008-0545-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Frontal Knee Alignment: Three-dimensional Marker Positions and Clinical Assessment

Abstract: We assessed the validity of the hip-knee-ankle angle measured statically during three-dimensional (3-D) gait analysis and the tibial angle using an inclinometer compared with the mechanical axis on radiographs. Eleven individuals (20 knees) with radiographic knee osteoarthritis (OA) participated in this study. We determined the following: the lower-limb mechanical axis using weightbearing long-leg radiographs; hip-knee-ankle angle using the techniques of 3-D gait analysis in a static standing position; and tib… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(33 reference statements)
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The rotational position of the knee compared to the hip and ankle is variable, and a perceived constitutional varus could therefore in fact be an external rotation of one subject's limb as compared to another. In our study, however, the rotational position of the lower extremities was controlled by positioning the extremities with the patellae facing forward, as was used by many previous authors who have studied lower leg alignment [7,18,21,22,26,28,38]. We believe, by doing so, the rotational effect is minimized.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The rotational position of the knee compared to the hip and ankle is variable, and a perceived constitutional varus could therefore in fact be an external rotation of one subject's limb as compared to another. In our study, however, the rotational position of the lower extremities was controlled by positioning the extremities with the patellae facing forward, as was used by many previous authors who have studied lower leg alignment [7,18,21,22,26,28,38]. We believe, by doing so, the rotational effect is minimized.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second limitation to our study is the use of full-leg standing radiographs for our measurements. Although this method is well validated in the literature and has excellent intra-and interobserver reliability, the rotational position of the lower extremities might influence the outcome of the measurements [8,12,13,21,27,38]. The rotational position of the knee compared to the hip and ankle is variable, and a perceived constitutional varus could therefore in fact be an external rotation of one subject's limb as compared to another.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The frontal knee alignment measured with an inclinometer has good correlation with measurement of mechanical axis of the leg on radiographs (r=0.83) [57].…”
Section: -B)mentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The validity of measurements taken with goniometers and inclinometers has been concurrently assessed with radiographs only for shoulder protraction, lumbar lordosis, sagittal pelvic tilt and frontal lower limb alignment [51][52][53][54][55][56][57] (Table 1 For lower limb alignment assessment, correlation between goniometer measurements of Q angle and rearfoot alignment (tibiocalcaneus angle) and radiographs were weak to moderate (r=0.32 and 0.74 respectively) [53,56]. The frontal knee alignment measured with an inclinometer has good correlation with measurement of mechanical axis of the leg on radiographs (r=0.83) [57].…”
Section: -B)mentioning
confidence: 99%