Frontal sinus: is it a predictor for vertical malocclusions?

Metin-Gürsoy, Gamze; Akay, Gülsün; Tuncer, Burcu Baloş

doi:10.1007/s12565-020-00557-9

Cited by 11 publications

(26 citation statements)

References 20 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…As a result, the masticatory forces are a significant contributor to mechanical stress, so it is important to consider their size and direction. The amount of pneumatization is influenced by these mechanisms [ 31 ].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

The relationship between the dimensions of frontal air sinus and skeletal malocclusions: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Algahefi,

Al-Ak’hali,

Halboub

et al. 2024

Heliyon

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Some studies report a relationship with class III skeletal malocclusion [ 13 , [23] , [24] , [25] , [26] ], and other studies report a relationship with class II skeletal malocclusion [ [27] , [28] , [29] ]. Other studies have linked the frontal sinus with the vertical growth pattern [ [30] , [31] , [32] ].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The relationship between the dimensions of frontal air sinus and skeletal malocclusions: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Algahefi,

Al-Ak’hali,

Halboub

et al. 2024

Heliyon

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…According to the angle ANB, which is the angle between the Nasion, A, and B points, three equal groups were created consisting of skeletal Class I (20 individuals, 00 ≤ ANB ≤ 40), skeletal Class II due to mandibular deficiency (20 individuals, 40<ANB) and skeletal Class III due to mandibular excess (20 individuals, ANB <00). Moreover, the part located between the sella (S) and nasion (N) points was calculated as the anterior skull base length, the part between the condilion (Co) and A points was calculated as the effective maxillary length, and the part between the condilion (Co) and gnathion (Gn) points was calculated as the effective mandibular length Furthermore, the Sella-Nasion-Gonion-Gnathion plane angle (SN-GoGn) and the Frankfort-mandibular plane angle (FMA), two commonly used angles, were analyzed in terms of the groups’ vertical values ( 17 , 18 ).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

The relationship between frontal sinus dimensions and skeletal malocclusion

Tunca¹,

Kaplan²,

Kaya³

et al. 2022

eor

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim of this retrospective research is to compare frontal sinus dimensions in skeletal Class I, skeletal Class II, and skeletal Class III individuals and to evaluate the relationship of these dimensions with anterior skull base length and some cephalometric values. Materials and MethodsIn this research, we used lateral cephalometric radiographs of 60 people aged 17 to 25. In individuals with skeletal Class I malocclusion, skeletal Class II malocclusion due to mandibular insufficiency, and skeletal Class III malocclusion due to mandibular excess, measurements of frontal sinus length and height as well as S-N, Co-A and Co-Gn lengths, ANB 0 , FMA 0 , SN-GoGn 0 angles values were performed. The length between the highest point and the lowest point of the frontal sinus was calculated as the height of the frontal sinus, and the length between the most anterior and the most posterior points of the frontal sinus was calculated as the length of the frontal sinus. ResultsThe frontal sinus length and height were found to be higher in skeletal Class III individuals than in skeletal Class I and skeletal Class II individuals, however, there was no significant difference between skeletal Class I and Class II individuals. ConclusionThe increase in frontal sinus height and length correlated positively with the decrease in the ANB angle and the increase in the SN and Co-Gn lengths. The dimensions of the frontal sinus may be an indicator for the remaining mandibular growth potential.

show abstract

“…Пазухи могут начать формироваться, довольно непостоянно, у людей в возрасте двух лет. Однако они часто не видны рентгенологически примерно до шести лет (Enlowand Hans, 1996; Dixonetal., 1997; Tatlisumaketal., 2008; da Silvaet al, 2009; Верма и др., 2015) [19] Развитие и рост лобной пазухи тесно связаны с конкретными возрастными периодами роста черепа, это показали исследования (Rossouwetal. 1991; Rufand Pancherz 1996), что размер лобной пазухи связан с характером роста.…”

unclassified

“…Также нужно учитывать тот факт, что нормальное развитие придаточных пазух носа может продолжаться и в раннем взрослом возрасте; однако воспалительные состояния, фиброзно-костные поражения, врожденные аномалии, предыдущие операции на носу или злокачественные новообразования носовых пазух могут исказить костную структуру придаточных пазух носа (Bolgeretal. 1997) [19,11]. ВЫВОДЫ Проведенный анализ литературы подтверждает, что значительное количество исследований, посвященных изучению развития и структуры лобной пазухи в постнатальном онтогенезе, по отношению к возрастным, половым и экологическим территориальным особенностям долгое время оставались неизвестными, и до сегодняшнего времени полностью не изучены.…”

unclassified