2016 IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/wacv.2016.7477558
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Frontal to profile face verification in the wild

Abstract: We have collected a new face data set that will facilitate research in the problem of frontal to profile face verification 'in the wild'. The aim of this data set is to isolate the factor of pose variation in terms of extreme poses like profile, where many features are occluded, along with other 'in the wild' variations. We call this data set the Celebrities in Frontal-Profile (CFP) data set. We find that human performance on Frontal-Profile verification in this data set is only slightly worse (94.57% accuracy… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
423
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 676 publications
(427 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
3
423
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We perform experiments with different noise rates, supervised AM-Losses and computing weighted loss methods(see Section 4.2.2) with the experiment in the Section 3.2. The models are evaluated on Labelled Faces in the Wild (LFW) [16], Celebrities in Frontal Profile (CFP) [37], and Age Database (AgeDB) [28]. As shown in Table 1, competitive performance can be achieved using our paradigm, without any prior knowledge about noise in training data.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We perform experiments with different noise rates, supervised AM-Losses and computing weighted loss methods(see Section 4.2.2) with the experiment in the Section 3.2. The models are evaluated on Labelled Faces in the Wild (LFW) [16], Celebrities in Frontal Profile (CFP) [37], and Age Database (AgeDB) [28]. As shown in Table 1, competitive performance can be achieved using our paradigm, without any prior knowledge about noise in training data.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This information set could be named from the Superstars in Front-Profile (CFP) data-set. We analyzed the recital greater than several different calculations employing a restricted process and described how those all embarrass by Front-Front to Front-Account [33].…”
Section: Literature Review Of Associated Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• We show that the proposed AFRN improves effectively the accuracy of both face verification and face identification. • To investigate the effectiveness of the AFRN, we present extensive experiments on the public available datasets such as LFW [11], YTF [37], Cross-Age LFW (CALFW), Cross-Pose LFW (CPLFW), Celebrities in Frontal-Profile in the Wild (CFP) [30], AgeDB [23], IARPA Janus Benchmark-A (IJB-A) [17], IARPA Janus Benchmark-B (IJB-B) [36], and IARPA Janus Benchmark-C (IJB-C) [22]. ded features.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%