Frontline learning of medical teaching: “you pick up as you go through work and practice”

Abstract

BackgroundFew medical teachers have received formal teaching education. Along with individual and organizational barriers to participation in teacher training programs, increasing numbers and altered distribution of physicians away from major teaching centers have increased the difficulty of attendance. Furthermore, it is not known if traditional faculty development formats are the optimal learning options given findings from existing studies document both positive and negative outcomes. There is a gap in research that explores how medical teachers learn to teach and also limited research regarding how medical teachers actually teach.The purpose of this study was to provide insight into how physicians describe their teaching of trainees, and the nature of their teaching development and improvement to inform faculty development programs.MethodsSemi-structured interviews were conducted with 36 physicians, with a broad range of teaching experience, purposefully selected from five disciplines: Internal Medicine, Pediatrics, Psychiatry, Surgery, and Family Medicine. A qualitative, inductive approach was used to analyse the data.ResultsTeaching was described as being centered on the needs of individual trainees, but was dependent on patient presentation and environmental context. For this group of physicians learning to teach was perceived as a dynamic and evolving process influenced by multiple life experiences. The physicians had not learnt to teach through formal education and then put that learning into practice, but had learnt to teach and improve their teaching through their trial and errors teaching. Life experiences unconnected with the medical environment contributed to their knowledge of teaching along with limited formal learning to teach experiences. Teaching practice was influenced by peers and trainees, feedback, and observation. The findings suggest these medical teachers learn to teach along a continuum largely through their teaching practice.ConclusionThe findings suggested that the participants’ major resource for learning how to teach was informal experiential learning, both in and out of the workplace. This may have implications for faculty development strategies for medical teaching education.

What Makes a Surgical Teacher Great?

“…The answer is yes! Earlier, there was no formal training for surgical teachers; they were just experts in what they taught, but most of them learned the art and science of teaching as they went along by informal experiential learning [39]. Now, several universities and national organizations like Medical Council of India run short teaching-improvement workshops/courses which enable medical teachers to understand basic educational theories, knowledge gaps related to education, the role of teaching for surgeons, teaching tools to improve teaching performance, setting learning goals, curriculum development/evaluation, creating teaching content, assessment of learning, educational research, their own individual needs, and how to improve interactive experiences with learners [40].…”

Motivations of assessment item writers in medical programs: a qualitative study

“…Furthermore, access to training may be limited due to their responsibilities being undefined. In some contexts, accreditation, professional standards or institutional requirements for professional development in assessment may not exist or be implemented [14]. Whether potential item writers should be expected to have such skills and produce items will vary across institutions, although the need to produce items is universal.…”

HACASE: A simple and versatile framework for session design and delivery

“…Designing and delivering teaching or training is often simultaneously exciting and terrifying. Many healthcare professionals are expected to teach undergraduates and postgraduates, or train colleagues, patients and their families, with little or no formal training in providing education themselves (Hartford, Nimmon and Stenfors, 2017). This can lead to a lack of confidence in this vital aspect of their role.…”