1988
DOI: 10.1016/0021-9991(88)90002-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fronts propagating with curvature-dependent speed: Algorithms based on Hamilton-Jacobi formulations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
7,935
0
79

Year Published

1998
1998
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12,158 publications
(8,027 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
13
7,935
0
79
Order By: Relevance
“…Level set methods were first developed by Osher and Sethian in [44] and have been used to study the evolution of moving surfaces that experience frequent topology changes (e.g., merger of regions and fragmentation), particularly in the contexts of fluid mechanics and computer graphics. (See the books [43,48] and references [42,44,49].)…”
Section: Narrow Band/local Level Set Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Level set methods were first developed by Osher and Sethian in [44] and have been used to study the evolution of moving surfaces that experience frequent topology changes (e.g., merger of regions and fragmentation), particularly in the contexts of fluid mechanics and computer graphics. (See the books [43,48] and references [42,44,49].)…”
Section: Narrow Band/local Level Set Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(See the books [43,48] and references [42,44,49].) In the level set method, the location of a region Ω is captured implicitly by introducing an auxilliary signed distance function ϕ that satisfies (6) In the level set approach, instead of explicitly tracking the position of interface Σ and manually handling topology changes, the level set function is updated by solving a PDE, which automatically accounts for the interface motion and all topology changes.…”
Section: Narrow Band/local Level Set Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Active contour methods typically solve the contour evolution equation using the Level Set Method (Osher and Sethian, 1988;Sethian, 1999). This approach ensures numerical stability and allows the contour to change topology.…”
Section: Active Contour Evolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The above scheme for surface matching is complicated to implement due to the need to maintain information on surface triangulations and compute numerical derivatives of quantities such as the surface Laplacians of fields defined on surfaces, and the components and Christoffel symbols of the surface metric. Intriguingly, the approach can be greatly simplified if distance functions to the surfaces are computed in 3D (the socalled dlevel setT approach; Osher and Sethian, 1988). After some mathematical manipulation of the PDEs press, this volume), all computations can be performed in the 3D image, which eases numerical implementations.…”
Section: Mathematics Of Matching: Covariant Pdesmentioning
confidence: 99%