2018
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6420/aab2be
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Frozen Gaussian approximation for 3D seismic tomography

Abstract: Three-dimensional (3D) wave-equation-based seismic tomography is computationally challenging in large scales and high-frequency regime. In this paper, we apply the frozen Gaussian approximation (FGA) method to compute 3D sensitivity kernels and seismic tomography of high-frequency. Rather than standard ray theory used in seismic inversion (e.g. Kirchhoff migration and Gaussian beam migration), FGA is used to compute the 3D high-frequency sensitivity kernels for travel-time or full waveform inversions. Specific… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…then use FGA to compute the forward and adjoint wavefields and construct 3-D kernels of different phases by the methods of wave-equation-based traveltime tomography Liu & Gu 2012) and FWI (Pratt & Shipp 1999;Virieux & Operto 2009). Since FWI requires a more sophisticated initial velocity model for the convergence than wave-equation-based traveltime tomography, we use a hierarchical strategy as in our previous work (Chai et al 2018), which first uses waveequation-based traveltime tomography to create a macro-scale model and then adopts FWI to generate a high-resolution micro-scale model. For the signals received at the top station (Fig.…”
Section: Wave-equation-based Traveltime Tomography and Fwimentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…then use FGA to compute the forward and adjoint wavefields and construct 3-D kernels of different phases by the methods of wave-equation-based traveltime tomography Liu & Gu 2012) and FWI (Pratt & Shipp 1999;Virieux & Operto 2009). Since FWI requires a more sophisticated initial velocity model for the convergence than wave-equation-based traveltime tomography, we use a hierarchical strategy as in our previous work (Chai et al 2018), which first uses waveequation-based traveltime tomography to create a macro-scale model and then adopts FWI to generate a high-resolution micro-scale model. For the signals received at the top station (Fig.…”
Section: Wave-equation-based Traveltime Tomography and Fwimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We will follow the strategy described in Chai et al (2018); Wei & Yang (2012), and consider the case illustrated in Fig. 7, where the level set functions φ re,tr for the transmitted P-waves satisfy the same evolution as φ in eq.…”
Section: Lemma Of Integration By Partsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, methods of this kind do not take into account the wave nature of radiation, but ray approximation is applied. Similar approaches are used in seismic tomography [33,34], where the seismic wave velocity distribution in the medium is reconstructed by time delays. The use of such methods is widespread in the method of ultrasonic nondestructive testing [35], in which, similarly to electromagnetic waves, in the scalar approximation, ultrasonic waves are described by the wave equation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To use RBM in seismic tomography, natural choices for computing synthetic seismograms are numerical methods of particle type, e.g., generalized ray theory [11,32], Kirchhoff migration [8,15], Gaussian beam migration [12,13,21,9,7,22], and frozen Gaussian approximation (FGA) [4,5,10,3]. Here for the sake of convenience, we use FGA to compute wave equations, which do not need to solve ray paths by shooting to reach the receivers, and can provide accurate solutions in the presence of caustics and multipathing, with no requirement on tuning beam width parameters to achieve a good resolution [2,12,6,23,19,33].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The above computation can also performed to wave-equation-based travel-time inversion, yielding a similar formulations except that the adjoint source function becomes (c.f. [5])…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%