2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.actao.2020.103641
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Frugivores vary in their response to neighborhood effects in a novel ecosystem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Frugivore visitation and fruit removal are often positively correlated with seedling recruitment (Muñoz et al, 2017) and are the most commonly collected data on the seed dispersal process (Schupp et al, 2019). Yet we have limited knowledge of the drivers of variation in frugivore visitation and fruit consumption at the level of individual plants’ (Hopson et al, 2020), even though such intraspecific variation in seed dispersal services has been proposed to affect plant population demography, evolution, and resilience to anthropogenic disturbances (Snell et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Frugivore visitation and fruit removal are often positively correlated with seedling recruitment (Muñoz et al, 2017) and are the most commonly collected data on the seed dispersal process (Schupp et al, 2019). Yet we have limited knowledge of the drivers of variation in frugivore visitation and fruit consumption at the level of individual plants’ (Hopson et al, 2020), even though such intraspecific variation in seed dispersal services has been proposed to affect plant population demography, evolution, and resilience to anthropogenic disturbances (Snell et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most existing knowledge on drivers of intraspecific variation in fruit removal and seed dispersal comes from studies of how fruit crop size and the local density of neighboring fruiting plants influence frugivore foraging decisions (Blendinger et al, 2008; Fontúrbel et al, 2017; García & Ortiz‐Pulido, 2004; Guerra et al, 2017; Hopson et al, 2020; Moreira et al, 2017; Pizo & Almeida‐Neto, 2009). In general, studies find that fruit crop size can increase visitation to individual plants.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We chose a 7 m radius because we expected that plants within this range could be perceived by animals (both birds and bees) and a greater radius would introduce more potential for perceptual obstruction by the dense vegetation. Furthermore, a 7 m radius is similar in size to other neighbourhood studies (Sargent 1990;Saracco et al 2005;Smith & McWilliams 2014;Hopson et al 2020). For our metrics of the number of focal plant flowers, conspecific flowers, and heterospecific flowers, we took the average number of flowers observed between two consecutive vegetation surveys to account for changes in the number of flowers over time, providing a single value for each observation interval.…”
Section: Focal and Neighbourhood Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, for generalist visitors, the number of flowers in the neighbourhood, whether conspecific or heterospecific, may impact visitation (Lázaro et al 2009). Furthermore, increased canopy cover can either increase visitation to plants, by providing perching sites, or can decrease visitation, by concealing flowering plants (Kolb & Ehrlén 2010;Hopson et al 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%