1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0304-4238(98)00182-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fruit and spur leaf growth and quality as influenced by low irradiance levels in pear

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
9
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This may be due to plant selection in dense populations, which ultimately causes variations in fruit weight and size at different locations. Similar findings were reported by Garriz et al, who wrote that closer spacing between plants of the same and other species affects the fruit size due to competition for light, nutrition and water [25]. …”
Section: Ahmed Et Alsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…This may be due to plant selection in dense populations, which ultimately causes variations in fruit weight and size at different locations. Similar findings were reported by Garriz et al, who wrote that closer spacing between plants of the same and other species affects the fruit size due to competition for light, nutrition and water [25]. …”
Section: Ahmed Et Alsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The content of soluble solids has often been considered to be highly correlated with the radiation level, since higher light exposure leads to an increase in carbohydrate assimilation and partitioning. This was found to be the case in plums,43 kiwifruit44 and some cultivars of French hybrid wine grapes,45 as well as in berries of Red Dutch in our study, but it was not the case in pear fruit46, 47 and the other two currant cultivars investigated in this paper. The biosynthetic pathways of these components during fruit development need to be investigated in individual currant cultivars for a thorough understanding of the impact of different growth conditions.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 48%
“…A recent, 10-year performance evaluation of Pacific Northwest (PNW) pear cultivars on promising, semidwarfing rootstocks from international programs did not produce new candidates for the United States (Einhorn et al, 2013). Considerable research effort is ongoing to understand and develop dwarfing in the pear germplasm (Elkins et al, 2012); in the interim, new acreage will continue to be established at low to moderate tree densities because few options exist to reduce inter-and intracanopy shading previously shown to limit fruit growth and productivity of pear Garriz et al, 1998;Kappel and Neilsen, 1994). Although these plantings may cost less in the short term, they limit early returns and opportunities to improve harvest efficiencies in the future (i.e., low-density plantings require time to develop large, complex canopies to maximize space efficiency, which, in turn, are dependent on tall ladders for harvest).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%