2018 Second International Conference on Electronics, Communication and Aerospace Technology (ICECA) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/iceca.2018.8474849
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

FSO Link Performance Analysis with Different Modulation Techniques under Atmospheric Turbulence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a viable approach to improve the system performance, free space optical (FSO) communication has attracted extensive attention for its advantage of high-speed, large bandwidth, flexible deployment, unlicensed spectrum and no interference [1]. However, the atmospheric turbulence, pointing errors, weather condition, modulation schemes and detection techniques can also deteriorate the system performance significantly [2]- [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As a viable approach to improve the system performance, free space optical (FSO) communication has attracted extensive attention for its advantage of high-speed, large bandwidth, flexible deployment, unlicensed spectrum and no interference [1]. However, the atmospheric turbulence, pointing errors, weather condition, modulation schemes and detection techniques can also deteriorate the system performance significantly [2]- [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2.510 (weak turbulence), α D = α E = 2.296, β D = β E = 1.822 (moderate turbulence), and α D = α E = 2.064, β D = β E = 1.342 (strong turbulence)[28].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this scenario, µ1, µ0, σ1, and σ0 stand for the mean values and standard deviations of sampled data, with S representing the threshold value. To enhance the Gaussian approximation, we compute Bit Error Rates (BERs) independently for different sampled symbols [8]. The error rates for M sampled values of logical 0 and N sampled values of logical 1 can be determined through the following calculations:…”
Section: Bit Error Rate (Ber)mentioning
confidence: 99%