A History of Farming Systems Research. 2000
DOI: 10.1079/9780851994055.0139
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

FSR in extension and policy formulation.

Abstract: This chapter has three contributions. The first one examines farming systems (FSR) extension in the USA, drawing attention to two cycles of FSR in extension in the country, first in the 1920s and 1930s when extension agents first sought to address the farm as a whole and latterly, since the 1980s with participatory approaches growing stronger and farmers becoming more concerned about the sustainability of their systems. The second contribution tracks the role of FSR in the evolution of the extension services i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, the establishment of land grant universities and related agricultural extension programmes could be considered a precursor to the kind of CU practices seen today. Those programmes may have initially been more hierarchical and prescriptive than reciprocal and participatory (Flora & Francis, 2000); however, they set the stage for an evolution towards more participatory methods such as those developed by Chambers (1987) in the 1980s. Although this work had a strong focus on agricultural production, Block (2010, p. 521) argues that food systems issues more broadly ‘often lend themselves to research and action involving community partners’ because food is so deeply relevant to people’s everyday lives.…”
Section: Framing Our Case: Cu Partnerships Community Food Security mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, the establishment of land grant universities and related agricultural extension programmes could be considered a precursor to the kind of CU practices seen today. Those programmes may have initially been more hierarchical and prescriptive than reciprocal and participatory (Flora & Francis, 2000); however, they set the stage for an evolution towards more participatory methods such as those developed by Chambers (1987) in the 1980s. Although this work had a strong focus on agricultural production, Block (2010, p. 521) argues that food systems issues more broadly ‘often lend themselves to research and action involving community partners’ because food is so deeply relevant to people’s everyday lives.…”
Section: Framing Our Case: Cu Partnerships Community Food Security mentioning
confidence: 99%