2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2020.03.037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

FTIR-assisted MALDI-TOF MS for the identification and typing of bacteria

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
32
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The MALDI-TOF MS approach, which establishes bacteria identification based on proteomic profiles, is likely unable to detect low differences at the genomic level, and thus returned no results. Different studies in the fields of bacteria identification suggest to combine MALDI Biotyper system analysis with Fourier-transfrom infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), which can be used to analyze carbohydrate and glycoproteins compounds, is able to provide a unique "fingerprint" spectrum for each species of bacteria exceeding the limit previously described (Maity et al, 2013;Feng et al, 2020). The three positive controls, belonging to different serogroups (i.e., 1, 3, and 6), were identified only at the species level without serogroup identification, confirming that the MALDI Biotyper system is unable to discriminate between L. pneumophila among serogroups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MALDI-TOF MS approach, which establishes bacteria identification based on proteomic profiles, is likely unable to detect low differences at the genomic level, and thus returned no results. Different studies in the fields of bacteria identification suggest to combine MALDI Biotyper system analysis with Fourier-transfrom infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), which can be used to analyze carbohydrate and glycoproteins compounds, is able to provide a unique "fingerprint" spectrum for each species of bacteria exceeding the limit previously described (Maity et al, 2013;Feng et al, 2020). The three positive controls, belonging to different serogroups (i.e., 1, 3, and 6), were identified only at the species level without serogroup identification, confirming that the MALDI Biotyper system is unable to discriminate between L. pneumophila among serogroups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…140 In both of these methods, the analyst is comparing and matching distinguished and discriminated peak (biomarker) in the MALDI-MS profiles of the bacteria under investigation with publicly available databases. 141,142 The use of MALDI-MS has been extended to a variety of research areas, including the direct analysis of organisms and biological tissue samples and the characterisation of peptide and protein components. [143][144][145] In addition to its qualitative applications, MALDI-MS is also a popular quantitative tool due to its ability to analyse molecules over a wide range of mass, its high sensitivity, easy and fast sample preparation, and short analysis time.…”
Section: An Introduction To Matrix-assisted Laser Desorption/ionisatimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) has been introduced into clinical microbiology laboratories. Due to the specificity, speed of analysis, and low cost of consumables, MALDI-TOF MS has been widely acclaimed for clinical bacterial identification (Welker et al, 2019;Feng et al, 2020;Nomura et al, 2020;Papagiannopoulou et al, 2020). MALDI-TOF MS identification is mainly based on the MS fingerprint pattern of bacterial ribosomal proteins in the m/z range of 2-20 kDa, which can be compared to the MS database to identify the bacterial genus and species (Singhal et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MALDI-TOF MS identification is mainly based on the MS fingerprint pattern of bacterial ribosomal proteins in the m/z range of 2-20 kDa, which can be compared to the MS database to identify the bacterial genus and species (Singhal et al, 2015). MALDI-TOF MS databases with more than 4000 strains have been set up and are widely used in the identification of clinical bacteria, fungi, mycobacteria, and Nocardia (Feng et al, 2020). Nevertheless, the single colonies are always needed for this method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%