Fuel burn evaluation of a transonic strut-braced-wing regional aircraft through multipoint aerodynamic optimisation

Abstract

This paper presents a relative fuel burn evaluation of the transonic strut-braced-wing configuration for the regional aircraft class in comparison to an equivalent conventional tube-and-wing aircraft. This is accomplished through multipoint aerodynamic shape optimisation based on the Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes equations. Aircraft concepts are first developed through low-order multidisciplinary design optimisation based on the design missions and top-level aircraft requirements of the Embraer E190-E2. High-fidelity aerodynamic shape shape optimisation is then applied to wing–body–tail models of each aircraft, with the objective of minimising the weighted-average cruise drag over a five-point operating envelope that includes the nominal design point, design points at $\pm 10\%$ nominal $C_L$ at Mach 0.78, and two high-speed cruise points at Mach 0.81. Design variables include angle-of-attack, wing (and strut) twist and section shape degrees of freedom, and horizontal tail incidence, while nonlinear constraints include constant lift, zero pitching moment, minimum wing and strut volume, and minimum maximum thickness-to-chord ratios. Results show that the multipoint optimised strut-braced wing maintains similar features to those of the single-point optimum, and compromises on-design performance by only two drag counts to achieve up to 11.6% reductions in drag at the off-design conditions. Introducing low-order estimates for approximating full aircraft performance, results indicate that the multipoint optimised strut-braced-wing regional jet offers a 13.1% improvement in cruise lift-to-drag ratio and a 7.8% reduction in block fuel over a 500nmi nominal mission when compared to the similarly optimised Embraer E190-E2-like conventional tube-and-wing aircraft.

Propulsion integration study of civil aero-engine nacelles

“…This airframe is representative of a conventional commercial transport aircraft with a cruise flight Mach number of 0.85 at C L = 0.5. The full configuration comprises the CRM airframe [17,18], nacelle [2], intake [19], exhaust [20] and pylon [21] (Fig. 1).…”