2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0378-7753(01)00882-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fuel cells for road transportation purposes — yes or no?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
56
0
2

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 147 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
56
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…They also offer advantages in terms of low weight and volume, compared to other FCs. 89 The proton exchange membrane is the most critical component in the PEM-FC configuration. It provides a separation between the fuel and the oxidant agent, but at the same time allows for transport of positive charges to compensate the electron transport.…”
Section: Electrolytementioning
confidence: 99%
“…They also offer advantages in terms of low weight and volume, compared to other FCs. 89 The proton exchange membrane is the most critical component in the PEM-FC configuration. It provides a separation between the fuel and the oxidant agent, but at the same time allows for transport of positive charges to compensate the electron transport.…”
Section: Electrolytementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although General Motors successfully launched their first modern production battery-powered electric vehicle (BEV) named EV1 in 1996, rare intermission for fast refuelling systems and high pressure from the oil industry company and car manufactures [16,17], together with weak consumer and federal government pressures [17] saw the car discontinued in 1999 and subsequently removed from the roads in 2003.…”
Section: Automotive Industry Status and Trendsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the offer of reduced dependency on fossil fuel and less maintenance and operating cost, the high initial cost of the battery, its heavy weight compared to gasoline, short driving range per charge, slow recharging, sluggish performance [16] reduced passenger and cargo space [18] has further declined the interest in BEVs. A confluence of technological advances, improved market conditions and economic and political factors are required to transform current BEVs into an attractive choice for consumers [19].…”
Section: Automotive Industry Status and Trendsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…La razón es, la aceptación social en el desarrollo de esta tecnología. Un informe de McNicol y colaboradores 91 , establece que un FCV puede tener un mayor éxito que un vehículo convencional ICE. Sin embargo, el costo inicial de un auto FCV es mucho mayor que un ICE.…”
Section: Estudio Comparativo De Las Diferentes Tecnologías De Celdas unclassified