2014
DOI: 10.1071/wf14009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fuel reduction burning mitigates wildfire effects on forest carbon and greenhouse gas emission

Abstract: A high-intensity wildfire burnt through a dry Eucalyptus forest in south-eastern Australia that had been fuel reduced with fire 3 months prior, presenting a unique opportunity to measure the effects of fuel reduction (FR) on forest carbon and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from wildfires at the start of the fuel accumulation cycle. Less than 3% of total forest carbon to 30-cm soil depth was transferred to the atmosphere in FR burning; the subsequent wildfire transferred a further 6% to the atmosphere. There wa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
39
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
4
39
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently Volkova et al (2014) (2014) who recently measured trace gas emissions factors with an FTIR system during prescribed fires in temperate forests in New South Wales, Australia. Our CO 2 emissions factors (reported per unit of dry fuel consumed) are slightly smaller for heading fires (∼ 1.5 %) and are larger for flanking (∼ 5 %) and backing fires (∼ 6 %) compared to Paton-Walsh et al (2014).…”
Section: Comparison With Previous Field and Laboratory Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently Volkova et al (2014) (2014) who recently measured trace gas emissions factors with an FTIR system during prescribed fires in temperate forests in New South Wales, Australia. Our CO 2 emissions factors (reported per unit of dry fuel consumed) are slightly smaller for heading fires (∼ 1.5 %) and are larger for flanking (∼ 5 %) and backing fires (∼ 6 %) compared to Paton-Walsh et al (2014).…”
Section: Comparison With Previous Field and Laboratory Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…25 Most of what is known about the VOC emissions from Australian temperate forest fires to date comes from opportunistic measurements of bushfire plumes impacting measurement sites such as the University of Wollongong (Paton-Walsh et al, 2005Rea et al, 2016) or the Cape Grim Baseline Air Pollution Station (Lawson et al, 2015) or captured from space using satellite sensors (Young and Paton-Walsh, 2011;Glatthor et al, 2013). Dedicated field and laboratory measurement campaigns have mostly focused on greenhouse gases (Hurst et al, 1996;Volkova et al, 2014;Possell et al, 2015;Surawski et al, 2015) for CO 2 and CO for several fuel classes combusted in a mass-loss calorimeter and estimated the total fraction of fuel carbon that would be emitted as CH 4 , particulates and non-methane hydrocarbons using a carbon mass balance approach. The only whole fire emission factors available are those from Hurst et al (1996), who sampled smoke plumes from fires in the greater Sydney region from an aircraft and reported emission factors for CO 2 , CO and CH 4 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This shows that FullCAM input parameters need further calibration to adequately represent dead standing and forest floor debris pools. Because these dead standing and debris pools make up the majority of biomass consumed in fire, e.g., [25,34] we do not recommend using FullCAM to model greenhouse gas emissions from forest fires.…”
Section: Fullcam Does Not Adequately Predict Dead Standing and Forestmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While understorey accounted for a minor proportion of AGC in studied forests (about 3%), it is an important carbon pool that can contribute between 2% and 28% to forest fire emissions [20,25]. The developed allometric equation for understorey trees will contribute to more accurate estimates of this small but significant carbon pool and improve our understanding of understorey contribution to forest carbon cycling and ecosystem productivity [35].…”
Section: Importance Of Allometric Equations For Small Treesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation