2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.tplants.2023.04.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fuels for ROS signaling in plant immunity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
20
0
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
1
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…MKP1 was shown to function as a negative regulator of MAMP-dependent ROS production, since mkp1 mutant alleles ( mkp1-1 and mkp1-2 ) displayed enhanced ROS accumulation in response to flg22 and chitin ( Escudero et al., 2019 ). Considering that induction of RBOHD, the key oxidase responsible of these ROS, is mainly achieved by its phosphorylation by different kinases ( Castro et al., 2021 ; Wu et al., 2023 ), we hypothesized that MKP1 could antagonize with some of these regulatory kinases and dephosphorylate RBOHD to limit ROS production. To assess this hypothesis, we introduced in mkp1-1 rbohD and rbohD genetic backgrounds constructs harboring RBOHD wild-type (WT) gene fused to a tag (FLAG) under the control of its own promoter ( pD::FLAG-RBOHD line), or RBHOD carrying mutations in the phosphosites of RBOHD that are the targets of activating kinases during immunity: Ser (S) to Ala (A) mutations in three phosphosites that are the target of BIK1 during PTI responses ( pD::FLAG::RBOHD S39A/S339A/S343A ; Kadota et al., 2014 ; Li et al., 2014 ) and in two phosphosites that are also activated in PTI and ETI responses ( pD::FLAG::RBOHD S343A/S347A ; Kadota et al., 2019 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…MKP1 was shown to function as a negative regulator of MAMP-dependent ROS production, since mkp1 mutant alleles ( mkp1-1 and mkp1-2 ) displayed enhanced ROS accumulation in response to flg22 and chitin ( Escudero et al., 2019 ). Considering that induction of RBOHD, the key oxidase responsible of these ROS, is mainly achieved by its phosphorylation by different kinases ( Castro et al., 2021 ; Wu et al., 2023 ), we hypothesized that MKP1 could antagonize with some of these regulatory kinases and dephosphorylate RBOHD to limit ROS production. To assess this hypothesis, we introduced in mkp1-1 rbohD and rbohD genetic backgrounds constructs harboring RBOHD wild-type (WT) gene fused to a tag (FLAG) under the control of its own promoter ( pD::FLAG-RBOHD line), or RBHOD carrying mutations in the phosphosites of RBOHD that are the targets of activating kinases during immunity: Ser (S) to Ala (A) mutations in three phosphosites that are the target of BIK1 during PTI responses ( pD::FLAG::RBOHD S39A/S339A/S343A ; Kadota et al., 2014 ; Li et al., 2014 ) and in two phosphosites that are also activated in PTI and ETI responses ( pD::FLAG::RBOHD S343A/S347A ; Kadota et al., 2019 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also performed the same experiments after elicitation of all these genotypes with the fungal MAMP chitohexaose (CHI6), obtaining similar results, though the effect of mkp1-1 mutation on ROS levels was lower in pD::FLAG::RBOHD S343A/S347A than in pD::FLAG::RBOHD S39A/S339A/S343A ( Figure 1B and Supplementary Figure S1B ). The fact that the RBOHD lines with altered phosphosites displayed enhanced ROS production under mkp1-1 background compared to WT ( MKP1 ) plants suggests that MKP1 could negatively regulate RBOHD by mediating dephosphorylation of some additional phosphosites to the ones that are targeted by BIK1 and the main regulatory kinases of RBOHD documented ( Castro et al., 2021 ; Wu et al., 2023 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations