2018
DOI: 10.15359/ree.22-3.4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fuentes de conocimiento en la identificación y preferencias de fauna en niñez de contextos rurales y urbanos

Abstract: This article analyzes the influence of mass media on primary school students when studying animal species. Images on taxonomic groups of wildlife transmit perceptions. Therefore, these transmitted perceptions are examined in 249 children from rural and urban elementary school aged 7 to 13 years old. This analysis used two PowerPoint presentations with images of endemic and non-endemic species. It is found that in urban and rural contexts, television and Internet are the means for further identification of the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

2
2
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In line with our first hypothesis (H1.1) and with previous research about human preferences for animals (Czech & Krausman, 2001; Kellert, 1993a, 1993b, 1996; Knight, 2008; Lišková & Frynta, 2013; Torres-Merchan et al, 2018), squirrel, bird, and butterfly were perceived as more attractive than bat, moth, and ant. As expected (H1.2 & H1.3), children evaluated hurting attractive animals as equally wrong as hurting another child, and hurting unattractive animals was judged less severely.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In line with our first hypothesis (H1.1) and with previous research about human preferences for animals (Czech & Krausman, 2001; Kellert, 1993a, 1993b, 1996; Knight, 2008; Lišková & Frynta, 2013; Torres-Merchan et al, 2018), squirrel, bird, and butterfly were perceived as more attractive than bat, moth, and ant. As expected (H1.2 & H1.3), children evaluated hurting attractive animals as equally wrong as hurting another child, and hurting unattractive animals was judged less severely.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…We expect that some animals will be perceived as more attractive than others. Specifically, in line with previous studies (Czech & Krausman, 2001; Kellert, 1993b, 1996; Knight, 2008; Lišková & Frynta, 2013; Torres-Merchan et al, 2018), squirrel, bird, and butterfly are expected to be perceived as more attractive than bat, moth, and ant (Hypothesis 1.1, H1.1). Children tend to attribute human characteristics to animals (i.e., anthropomorphize them).…”
supporting
confidence: 76%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Siendo los medios de comunicación, como internet, redes sociales, servicios de streaming, televisión o películas de origen extranjero la fuente de información principal de las personas, es más probable que un estudiante conozca mejor acerca de lo que ocurre en la sabana africana que de lo que ocurre en su patio trasero o su ciudad, puesto que frecuentemente se utilizan a las especies carismáticas para representar ecosistemas, diseñar estrategias de concientización ambienta o recaudar fondos (Ballouard, Brischoux y Bonnet, 2011;Torres-Merchan, Salcedo-Plazas, Becerra-Niño y Valderrama, 2018). El principal aspecto perjudicial de priorizar especies carismáticas es el relegar el resto de la biodiversidad y factores abióticos de los ecosistemas del conocimiento de la comunidad, conduciendo al aislamiento y falta de contacto entre las personas y su entorno inmediato (Ballouard, Brischoux y Bonnet, 2011;Ducarme, Luque y Courchamp, 2013;Colléony, Clayton, Couvet, Jalme, Saint y Prévot., 2017).…”
unclassified