2010
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)ee.1943-7870.0000260
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fugitive Methane Emissions from Landfills: Field Comparison of Five Methods on a French Landfill

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
45
0
6

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
45
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…First, rough and/or irregular topography contribute to unusual wind currents, which often result in unusable data due to plume mixing and is given as a method restriction (Babilotte et al, 2008). Secondly, a method for properly defining the upwind surface area contributing to the flux (Goldsmith et al, 2008) for landfills had not been addressed until recently.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…First, rough and/or irregular topography contribute to unusual wind currents, which often result in unusable data due to plume mixing and is given as a method restriction (Babilotte et al, 2008). Secondly, a method for properly defining the upwind surface area contributing to the flux (Goldsmith et al, 2008) for landfills had not been addressed until recently.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A variety of methods, such as dynamic and static mobile plume monitoring, inverse plume modeling, differential adsorption LiDAR (light detection and ranging), and radial plume mapping, exist to estimate the emissions of methane from the landfill surface (Babilotte et al, 2008). However, none of these methods has been sufficiently field tested to resolve uncertainties and develop best implementation practices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The tracer release method was developed to quantify pollutant emissions and has already been used in a wide range of studies to estimate the sources of various types of gases such as methane (Babilotte et al, 2010), carbon monoxide (Möllmann-Coers et al, 2002) and isoprene (Lamb et al, 1986). This method consists of releasing a tracer gas with a known rate close to the targeted gas source when this source is clearly localised and of measuring both the targeted and tracer concentrations in sections of the downwind emission plumes.…”
Section: The Tracer Release Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are instruments for gas concentration measurements (Babilotte et al, 2010;Crosson, 2008;McManus et al, 2008) or even flux measurements (McDermitt et al, 2011;Hendriks et al, 2008;Tuzson et al, 2010) that are well-suited for field applications but that do not provide a 2-D-concentration distribution. Certain variants of direct TDLAS (tunable diode laser absorption spectroscopy) are powerful techniques for field applications, as no reference gas measurement is needed for calibration (Buchholz et al, 2014) they are based on robust, industrially available components.…”
Section: A Seidel Et Al: Robust Spatially Scanning Open-path Tdlamentioning
confidence: 99%