2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-59939-7_8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fukaya A ∞-structures Associated to Lefschetz Fibrations. II

Abstract: Floer cohomology groups are usually defined over a field of formal functions (a Novikov field). Under certain assumptions, one can equip them with connections, which means operations of differentiation with respect to the Novikov variable. This allows one to write differential equations for Floer cohomology classes. Here, we apply that idea to symplectic cohomology groups associated to Lefschetz fibrations, and establish a relation with enumerative geometry.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
78
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 91 publications
(216 reference statements)
3
78
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is because the Fukaya category A(π) is defined to be the Z/2‐invariant subcategory of the Fukaya category F(E), where trueE is a double cover of E branched along the smooth fiber M*. However, this assumption can actually be removed since the Fukaya category A(π) can also be defined directly on E using a particular class of Hamiltonian perturbations specified in , without passing to the double branched cover trueE. Alternatively, A(π) can be defined as a version of partially wrapped Fukaya category .…”
Section: Formality Of A∞‐structuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is because the Fukaya category A(π) is defined to be the Z/2‐invariant subcategory of the Fukaya category F(E), where trueE is a double cover of E branched along the smooth fiber M*. However, this assumption can actually be removed since the Fukaya category A(π) can also be defined directly on E using a particular class of Hamiltonian perturbations specified in , without passing to the double branched cover trueE. Alternatively, A(π) can be defined as a version of partially wrapped Fukaya category .…”
Section: Formality Of A∞‐structuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lemma 4.2]. Assume that(58) holds, and as an A-bimodule, B is quasiisomorphic to A ⊕ (B/A)[−1], then the A ∞ -category B σ is quasi-isomorphic to the trivial extension constructed from A and the A-bimodule (B/A)[−1].Geometrically, the construction above can be applied to the pairing (A, B) = (A(π), V(M )),…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Iterating this argument infinitely many times (which we can do as each quasiisomorphism increases the length), we obtain the following lemma (cf. [62,Lemma A.5]). …”
Section: Let Us Write (Lcamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One candidate is the theory of Seidel-Fukaya category [23][24][25], which studies J-holomorphic sections of exact Morse fibrations. Seidel also studied a related theory called Fukaya category of Lefschetz fibration [26,27]. Haydys [11] studied the perturbed Cauchy-Riemann equation on C, and considered its Floer theory.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%