2012
DOI: 10.1007/s10955-012-0493-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Full Connectivity: Corners, Edges and Faces

Abstract: We develop a cluster expansion for the probability of full connectivity of high density random networks in confined geometries. In contrast to percolation phenomena at lower densities, boundary effects, which have previously been largely neglected, are not only relevant but dominant. We derive general analytical formulas that show a persistence of universality in a different form to percolation theory, and provide numerical confirmation. We also demonstrate the simplicity of our approach in three simple but in… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
136
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(140 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
4
136
0
Order By: Relevance
“…That is, in d = 2 the larger number of nodes in the bulk dominates the lower probability of links for nodes near the boundary. However, the present authors [16] have pointed out that for practical purposes, namely approximating P f c in a realistic system, the size is not exponentially large, and the bulk, edges, or corners may dominate the connection probability [16] depending on the density. Thus, we are interested in results involving more general limiting processes, as well as useful approximations for finite cases.…”
Section: A Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 74%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…That is, in d = 2 the larger number of nodes in the bulk dominates the lower probability of links for nodes near the boundary. However, the present authors [16] have pointed out that for practical purposes, namely approximating P f c in a realistic system, the size is not exponentially large, and the bulk, edges, or corners may dominate the connection probability [16] depending on the density. Thus, we are interested in results involving more general limiting processes, as well as useful approximations for finite cases.…”
Section: A Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…The connection (and hence k-connection) probability P f c can then be written in "semigeneral" form [16] as a sum of contributions from different boundary elements, (9) below. To illustrate the notation, we give the case of a square domain: …”
Section: B Summary Of New Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We model a wireless network as a random geometric graph (RGG) with a probabilistic pair connection rule [25], [26]. Consider a set V n = {1, .…”
Section: Model and Assumptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where, in this context, r 0 signifies the typical connection range (rather than the maximum), which encompasses physical system characteristics, such as the transmit power, wavelength, and the noise figure [22], [23], [25]. The parameter η is the path loss exponent in this model, and thus it typically takes on values in the range 2 ≤ η ≤ 5; mathematically, it simply controls the stretch of the decaying exponential, and by letting η → ∞, we recover the hard connection model.…”
Section: B Graph Entropy Conditioned On Node Positionsmentioning
confidence: 99%