2016
DOI: 10.1515/amm-2016-0142
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Full Contoured Tooth-Implant Supported 3-Pointic All-Ceramic Denture During Occlusal Load Transfer in Lateral Region

Abstract: Implant and a tooth supported dentures are avoided by dentists because of uneven distribution of occlusal loads between a stiffer implant and a more pliable tooth. The hypothesis was that a 3-point all-ceramic bridge supported on a natural second premolar tooth and a two-pieces typical implant bears safely mastication loads. The finite element analysis showed that the implant splinted by all-ceramic zirconium bridge with the second premolar was safe under lateral mastication load, but there was found an overlo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

2
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, Figure 8 showed that the region where the stress is very concentrated is closest to sharp margin of solid bodies of cortical bone. This region is the area around the dental implant neck, which coincides with the area where bone atrophy occurs due to overload in long-term clinical practice, which is similar to previous finite element analysis results and interpretations for dental implants [34].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…In addition, Figure 8 showed that the region where the stress is very concentrated is closest to sharp margin of solid bodies of cortical bone. This region is the area around the dental implant neck, which coincides with the area where bone atrophy occurs due to overload in long-term clinical practice, which is similar to previous finite element analysis results and interpretations for dental implants [34].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The study showed an average hardness of porcelain 562.24 HV 0.5 . This result is similar to the hardness of the enamel [4,15,16]. The patient's own teeth should not rub off on contact with the restorations.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Cracks that have arisen in this group are the result of compressive force that was loaded centrally on the occlusal surfaces. It should also be noted that the authors of many publications on the biomechanics of the mastication reflect the gentle slope of the teeth during biting [15][16][17][18]. Good mechanical properties obtained by zirconia allow for using it for manufacturing of substructures with a smaller wall thickness.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation