2021
DOI: 10.6007/ijarafms/v11-i3/10548
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Full Cost Vs Successful Efforts Accounting: A Systematic Review

Abstract: Harmonization of the accounting practice has long been on the front burner as an agenda for improving the quality of financial reporting the world over. This study is a qualitative review of the Full cost (FC) and Successful efforts (SE) methods of accounting in the oil and gas sector, given the ongoing controversy over which method should take precedence. A unique analysis was adopted by assessing the merits and demerits of the FC and SE methods based on selected qualitative criteria (conceptual, IASB framewo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 6 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, their capitalization according to the total cost method does not comply with the principle of matching revenues with expenses. It also does not comply with standards of the accounting framework, as it does not meet the criteria for defining assets (Erhomosele & Rahim, 2021).…”
Section: Methods Of Accounting For Drilling and Development Expensesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, their capitalization according to the total cost method does not comply with the principle of matching revenues with expenses. It also does not comply with standards of the accounting framework, as it does not meet the criteria for defining assets (Erhomosele & Rahim, 2021).…”
Section: Methods Of Accounting For Drilling and Development Expensesmentioning
confidence: 99%