We propose a thorough analysis of the tensor tomography problem on the Euclidean unit disk parameterized in fan-beam coordinates. This includes, for the inversion of the Radon transform over functions, using another range characterization first appearing in [32] to enforce in a fast way classical moment conditions at all orders. When considering directiondependent integrands (e.g., tensors), a problem where injectivity no longer holds, we propose a suitable representative (other than the traditionally sought-after solenoidal candidate) to be reconstructed, as well as an efficient procedure to do so. Numerical examples illustrating the method are provided at the end. 1 A non-trapping Riemannian manifold (dim â„ 2) with boundary is called simple if it has no conjugate points and its boundary is strictly convex.On studying question (ii), the solenoidal-potential decomposition of an m tensor f = dh+f s (with h an m â 1 tensor vanishing on âM ), true for any L 2 tensor f and where each summand is continuous in terms of f , suggests that, since If = If s , the "solenoidal" tensor f s is a good candidate as a representative to be reconstructed from data If . In this direction, Sharafutdinov provided a reconstruction of f s in Euclidean free space in any dimension in [39, Theorem 2.12.2], Kazantsev and Bukhgeim proposed in [22] a reconstruction algorithm for a tensor of arbitrary order in the case of the Euclidean unit disk, see also [21,46,8,6] for further works on the topic and the recent work [7]. Another approach is to make use of the theory of A-analytic functionsĂ la Bukhgeim, which has successfully led to range characterizations and inversion formulas, most recently in [36,38,37] for the ray transform in Euclidean convex domains over functions, vector fields and two-tensors, including attenuation coefficients.The solenoidal representative is arguably not an easy quantity to work with: Sharafutdinov's formulas involve iterated use of the non-local operator â â1 d 2 , where â denotes componentwise Laplacian, and the expression of d 2 depends on the tensor order. A first salient feature of this paper is to exploit another decomposition, arising naturally for instance when performing Fourier analysis on tangent fibers: doing this comes with a different inner product structure than the one traditionally used on tensor fields, and in particular, this motivates another tensor decomposition than the solenoidal-potential one. This decomposition has proved to be more natural in earlier contexts such as the search for conformal Killing tensor fields (see for instance [41, 42] or [5, Theorem 1.5]). Here we exploit this other decomposition to provide, for any tensor field, an element to be reconstructed with some advantages: its Fourier components are made up of a function to be inverted for via "traditional" inverse X-ray transform, plus additional terms which can be easily expressed in terms of analytic functions, the reconstruction of which via ad hoc Cauchy integrals is straighforward and efficient; in addition, the X-ray ...