2015
DOI: 10.1007/s00705-015-2431-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Full genome sequence of a putative novel mitovirus isolated from Rhizoctonia cerealis

Abstract: A putative novel mitovirus was found in isolate R1084 of the fungus Rhizoctonia cerealis, the causal agent of sharp eyespot of wheat in China. The full genome sequence of the virus was determined and analyzed. The complete cDNA sequence is 3149 nucleotides long with 59.7% A+T content. Using either the fungal mitochondrial or universal genetic code, the viral genome was found to contain a single large open reading frame that is predicted to encode a protein of 812 amino acids with an RNA-dependent RNA polymeras… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We therefore also searched the SRA data sets from these other projects for sequence reads highly similar to those of the original TSA hits from the respective plant species. Having identified such reads from several studies (Table S1), we were then able to assemble them into contigs that appear to represent nearly complete mitovirus genome sequences from three other sugar beet strains of Beta vulgaris (BioProjects PRJNA41497 and PRJNA254489; Dohm et al, 2014; Stracke et al, 2014), three other strains or sources of Cannabis sativa (hemp) (BioProjects PRJNA73819, PRJNA80055, and PRJNA178769; van Bakel et al, 2011), another source of Dahlia pinnata (a common ornamental) (BioProject PRJNA193277; Hodgins et al, 2014), another source of Erigeron breviscapus (a Chinese species of fleabane used in traditional medicine) (BioProjects PRJNA229196 and PRJNA277583; Zhang et al, 2015), and another source of Petunia exserta (a Brazilian species of increasing use as an ornamental) (BioProject PRJNA300556; Sheehan et al, 2016) (Table 1; other assembly details in Table S2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We therefore also searched the SRA data sets from these other projects for sequence reads highly similar to those of the original TSA hits from the respective plant species. Having identified such reads from several studies (Table S1), we were then able to assemble them into contigs that appear to represent nearly complete mitovirus genome sequences from three other sugar beet strains of Beta vulgaris (BioProjects PRJNA41497 and PRJNA254489; Dohm et al, 2014; Stracke et al, 2014), three other strains or sources of Cannabis sativa (hemp) (BioProjects PRJNA73819, PRJNA80055, and PRJNA178769; van Bakel et al, 2011), another source of Dahlia pinnata (a common ornamental) (BioProject PRJNA193277; Hodgins et al, 2014), another source of Erigeron breviscapus (a Chinese species of fleabane used in traditional medicine) (BioProjects PRJNA229196 and PRJNA277583; Zhang et al, 2015), and another source of Petunia exserta (a Brazilian species of increasing use as an ornamental) (BioProject PRJNA300556; Sheehan et al, 2016) (Table 1; other assembly details in Table S2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In current, ICTV-ratified taxonomy, family Narnaviridae comprises two genera, Narnavirus and Mitovirus , respectively containing two and five species of fungal viruses: Saccharomyces 20S RNA narnavirus and Saccharomyces 23S RNA narnavirus in genus Narnavirus ; Cryphonectria mitovirus 1 , Ophiostoma mitovirus 3a , Ophiostoma mitovirus 4 , Ophiostoma mitovirus 5 , and Ophiostoma mitovirus 6 in genus Mitovirus (Buck et al, 2005; Hong et al, 1998, 1999; Polashock and Hillman, 1994). Despite this small representation, many other apparent Mitovirus members have been reported to date from fungal hosts (Abdoulaye et al, 2017; Bartholomäus et al, 2016; Das et al, 2016; Heinze, 2012; Hillman and Cai, 2013; Khalifa and Pearson, 2014; Kitahara et al, 2014; Lakshman et al, 1998; Marzano et al, 2016; Vainio et al, 2015; Xie and Ghabrial, 2013; Xu et al, 2015; Zhang et al, 2015). Indeed, more than 90 accessions in the Nucleotide (nr/nt) database at GenBank appear to encompass the complete coding sequences of additional fungal mitoviruses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, two viruses from Rhizophagus species (phylum Mucoromycota, subphylum Glomeromycotina) (Kitahara et al, 2014), ten viruses from Rhizoctonia species (phylum Basidiomycota, subphylum Agaricomycotina) (Abdoulaye et al, 2017; Bartholomäus et al, 2016; Das et al, 2016; Lakshman et al, 1998; Marzano et al, 2016; Zhang et al, 2015), and one virus from Macrophomina phaseolina (phylum Ascomycota, subphylum Pezizomycotina) (Marzano et al, 2016) contain no UGA codons. Additionally, three other viruses from Rhizoctonia solani (Marzano et al, 2016) and one each from Agaricus bisporus and Clitocybe odora (phylum Basidiomycota, subphylum Agaricomycotina) (Heinze, 2012) contain only a low percentage of UGA codons (4–21%) vs. UGG codons (79–96%).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several previous authors have noted that any such mitoviruses with no UGA codons might express their RdRps and replicate their genomes not only in mitochondria but also or instead in the cytosol of their respective hosts (Das et al, 2016; Hillman and Cai, 2013; Hong et al, 1999; Kitahara et al, 2014; Lakshman et al, 1998; Zhang et al, 2015). Moreover, such capacity for cytosolic replication might have provided the selective pressure for this subset of mitoviruses to lack UGA codons.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous studies have been carried out indicating a high diversity among R. solani infecting mycoviruses [17][18][19][20]. However, only a small number of different species has been characterized so far, including species of the Partitiviridae, Endornaviridae, Narnaviridae and a few unclassified mycoviruses [21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28]. Deep sequencing analysis, especially of viral metagenomes, is currently the most efficient way to identify unknown viruses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%