Full mouth rehabilitation with fixed implant-supported prosthesis: A case report

Sunil, Motupalli; Reddy, Budigi Madan Mohan; Reddy, Thathekalva Sridhar; Reddy, Nagam Raja

doi:10.4103/2277-8632.122177

Cited by 5 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Successful implant treatment involves osseointegration of implants that are placed in ideal positions for the fabrication of a dental prosthesis. Surgical placement of dental implants is a well-documented treatment for edentulism 7 . Treatment success rates are high and postoperative complications were relatively modest in implant supported fixed partial denture.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Full mouth rehabilitation in a worn out dentition with collapsed bite using implants-a clinical report

Nazar¹,

Nair²,

Harshakumar³

et al. 2023

JPID

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Modern dentistry changed tremendously with implant surgery.For a successful implant therapy a proper diagnosis and treatment plans is required. Teeth loss may be due to physiological as well as pathological factors are common. The complete loss of teeth causes various problems like difficulty in mastication, improper phonetics, and unacceptable esthetics of patients.Implant supported prosthesis give the dentist an opportunity to restore normal function and esthetics.Successful osseointegration enables dentist and patient to accept a full arch dental prosthesis.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Full mouth rehabilitation in a worn out dentition with collapsed bite using implants-a clinical report

Nazar¹,

Nair²,

Harshakumar³

et al. 2023

JPID

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Successful osseointegration from the clinical standpoint is a measure of implant stability, which occurs after implant integration. [ 26 ] Two terms, the primary and the secondary implant stability, are related to implant therapy. Primary stability is associated with the mechanical engagement of an implant with the surrounding bone, whereas bone regeneration and remodeling phenomena determine the secondary (biological) stability to the implant.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…This failure is neither an indictment of one's professional skills nor necessarily a condemnation of the patient's response to the clinician's efforts. [ 2 ] There is a growing need of patients to be rehabilitated with a fixed, implant-supported prosthesis immediately after surgery, not only to minimize patient discomfort but also to restore functionality and esthetics quickly so that patients can return to their normal routine within a short period of time.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Implant survival between endo-osseous dental implants in immediate loading, delayed loading, and basal immediate loading dental implants a 3-year follow-up

Garg

Mishra

Alexander

et al. 2017

Ann Maxillofac Surg

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction:With introduction of the term “ossteointegration of dental implant” by Branemark, advancement in implantology from 1957 to 2017 has come a long way with modification in implant type and in loading time. This study aims to evaluate the survival of endo-osseous immediate loading (IL) implant and basal IL implants in atrophic jaws with objective to compare implant survival in atrophic jaws for full mouth rehabilitation between endo-osseous IL versus endo-osseous delayed loading (DL) versus basal IL during 3-year follow-up.Materials and Methods:Fifty-two (34 endo-osseous and 18 basal) implants were placed in 4 patients requiring full mouth rehabilitation in atrophic jaws. Case 1: Endo-osseous DL implants in upper and lower arch, Case 2: Endo-osseous IL implants in upper and lower arch, Case 3: Basal IL implant in upper and lower arch, and Case 4: Endo-osseous DL in upper arch and basal IL implant in the lower arch. Intraoperative evaluation was done on the basis of pain (visual analog scale [VAS]), operative time, and initial primary implant stability. Postoperative evaluation was done on pain (VAS), infection, radiographically successful implant (orthopantomogram), and patient satisfaction (Grade 0–10).Results:All cases showed satisfactory results but more amount of intra- and post-operative pain was felt with immediate basal implants.Conclusion:We believe that clinicians should comply with patient requests, and for this reason, we agree with some authors to use minimally invasive techniques and to avoid when possible esthetic or functional problems associated with the use of removable prosthesis after teeth extractions.

show abstract

“…Implant-supported prostheses have been reported to be an integral part of prosthodontic treatment planning, with high success rates and low postoperative complications [1]. In addition, fixed restorations provide a feeling of similarity to natural teeth and a sense of psychological stability [2], which is a good response in completely edentulous patients [3].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Immediately placed and immediately loaded implant rehabilitation has spread in the clinical setting, but situations such as poor primary stability may compel the dentist to follow a more conventional placement and a delayed loading protocol [4]. Previous studies reported that an immediate placement and immediate loading procedure is an effective method with a reduced treatment time [2, 3] and sufficient acceptance by patients [2, 4], and it allows immediate function and an improved appearance [5]. Immediate placement and immediate loading is also associated with high survival rates and has been met with increased patient satisfaction [2, 6].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Implant survival and patient satisfaction in completely edentulous patients with immediate placement of implants: a retrospective study

Kim¹,

Cho

Kim³

et al. 2018

BMC Oral Health

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundThis study evaluated full-arch rehabilitation of patients with immediately placed implants in terms of the cumulative implant survival rate, risk factors for implant failure, and patient satisfaction.MethodsTime-to-event data of 52 completely edentulous jaws (370 implants) were collected using retrospective clinical chart review for the time period from 2008 to 2014. A conventional two stage approach for surgery was adopted to immediately placed implants in the maxilla, and immediate placement and immediate loading protocols for the mandible were followed. The study calculated the 7-year cumulative survival rates (CSR), and a Bayesian hierarchical Cox proportional hazard model was used to measure the effect of covariates. Patient satisfaction on chewing ability, esthetic appearance, and overall satisfaction was also measured with a face-to-face interview survey.ResultsOf the total 370 implants, 194 were immediate placement. Two delayed loading maxillary implants failed within the first year, and another one failed in the second year of loading. Two failures were recorded in the first year and one in seven years for the immediate loading mandibular implants. The 1-, 5-, and 7-year CSR of the 370 implants were 0.989 (0.979, 1.000), 0.986 (0.975, 0.998), and 0.978 (0.957, 0.999), respectively. Only the length of the implant affected implant failure (p < 0.05); other patient characteristics, systemic diseases, implant diameter, immediate loading, and immediate placement, did not have an effect on implant failure rates. Patients reported a high degree of satisfaction regardless of their age group or length of the observation period.ConclusionsImmediately placed implant had CSR as high as delayed placed implants, and 7-year CSRs of immediate loading were not significantly different from delayed loading. The procedure also had a high degree of chewing ability, esthetic appearance, and overall satisfaction. The study results suggested that the clinical procedures applied in this study to completely edentulous patients were acceptable rehabilitation procedures.

show abstract

Full mouth rehabilitation with fixed implant-supported prosthesis: A case report

Cited by 5 publications

References 0 publications

Full mouth rehabilitation in a worn out dentition with collapsed bite using implants-a clinical report

Full mouth rehabilitation in a worn out dentition with collapsed bite using implants-a clinical report

Implant survival between endo-osseous dental implants in immediate loading, delayed loading, and basal immediate loading dental implants a 3-year follow-up

Implant survival and patient satisfaction in completely edentulous patients with immediate placement of implants: a retrospective study

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About