2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.carres.2021.108418
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Full NMR assignment, revised structure and biosynthetic analysis for the capsular polysaccharide from Streptococcus Pneumoniae serotype 15F

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The signal at δ C 101.70 ppm was were attributed to the (1 → 6)-linked d - Gal p residue, the corresponding anomeric proton signal appeared at δ H 5.02 ppm, which affirmed the (1 → 6)-linked d -Gal p was α - d -conformation ( Cui et al, 2007 , Pramanik et al, 2005 ) ( Table 3 ). Similarly, the signals at δ H /δ C 5.39/98.65 and 4.82/101.88 ppm belonged to H1/C1 of (1 → 3)- and (1 → 3,6)-linked α- d -Gal p residues, respectively ( Jing et al, 2014 , Li et al, 2021 , Siwińska et al, 2020 ). The signals of H1/C1 at δ H /δ C 5.86/111.19, 5.86/110.78, 5.57/98.50, 5.22/100.55, 5.18/101.18, 5.17/101.34, 5.04/101.53, 5.00/102.64, 4.90/102.20, 4.88/102.43, 4.52/103.12, and 4.40/102.83 confirmed the presence of T- α- l -Ara f -(1→ ( Zhang et al, 2021a ), →5)- α- l -Ara f -(1→ ( Makarova and Shakhmatov, 2020 , Chen et al, 2019 ), →3,6)- α- d -Man p -(1→ ( Chen et al, 2019 , Roslund et al, 2011 ), →2)- α- d -Man p -(1→ ( Smiderle et al, 2013 , Naumenko et al, 2020 ), →4)- α- d -Xyl p -(1→ ( He et al, 2013 ), →2)- α- d -Xyl p -(1→ ( Makarova & Shakhmatov, 2021 ), T- α- d -Man p -(1→ ( Roslund et al, 2011 , Liu et al, 2021a ), →3)- α-L - Rha p -(1→ ( Bellich et al, 2021 ), T- α- d -Xyl p -(1→ ( Makarova & Shakhmatov, 2021 ), →3)- α-D -Fuc p -(1→ ( Liu et al, 2021b , Szpakowska et al, 2020 ), →6)- β- d -Glc p - (1→ ( Liu et al, 2021b , Li et al, 2020 ), and T- β- d -Glc p -(1→ residues ( Li et al, 2020 , Wang and Guo, 2020 ), respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The signal at δ C 101.70 ppm was were attributed to the (1 → 6)-linked d - Gal p residue, the corresponding anomeric proton signal appeared at δ H 5.02 ppm, which affirmed the (1 → 6)-linked d -Gal p was α - d -conformation ( Cui et al, 2007 , Pramanik et al, 2005 ) ( Table 3 ). Similarly, the signals at δ H /δ C 5.39/98.65 and 4.82/101.88 ppm belonged to H1/C1 of (1 → 3)- and (1 → 3,6)-linked α- d -Gal p residues, respectively ( Jing et al, 2014 , Li et al, 2021 , Siwińska et al, 2020 ). The signals of H1/C1 at δ H /δ C 5.86/111.19, 5.86/110.78, 5.57/98.50, 5.22/100.55, 5.18/101.18, 5.17/101.34, 5.04/101.53, 5.00/102.64, 4.90/102.20, 4.88/102.43, 4.52/103.12, and 4.40/102.83 confirmed the presence of T- α- l -Ara f -(1→ ( Zhang et al, 2021a ), →5)- α- l -Ara f -(1→ ( Makarova and Shakhmatov, 2020 , Chen et al, 2019 ), →3,6)- α- d -Man p -(1→ ( Chen et al, 2019 , Roslund et al, 2011 ), →2)- α- d -Man p -(1→ ( Smiderle et al, 2013 , Naumenko et al, 2020 ), →4)- α- d -Xyl p -(1→ ( He et al, 2013 ), →2)- α- d -Xyl p -(1→ ( Makarova & Shakhmatov, 2021 ), T- α- d -Man p -(1→ ( Roslund et al, 2011 , Liu et al, 2021a ), →3)- α-L - Rha p -(1→ ( Bellich et al, 2021 ), T- α- d -Xyl p -(1→ ( Makarova & Shakhmatov, 2021 ), →3)- α-D -Fuc p -(1→ ( Liu et al, 2021b , Szpakowska et al, 2020 ), →6)- β- d -Glc p - (1→ ( Liu et al, 2021b , Li et al, 2020 ), and T- β- d -Glc p -(1→ residues ( Li et al, 2020 , Wang and Guo, 2020 ), respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…From the NMR spectra of PRP2 ( S-Fig. 11 ), ten anomeric H and C atoms appeared at δ H /δ C 5.88/110.82, 5.40/97.85, 5.17/101.99, 5.17/101.75, 5.06/101.39, 5.02/102.65, 5.01/101.09, 4.92/98.66, 4.89/101.86, and 4.39/102.43 ppm ( Table 3 ) were assigned to →5)- α- l -Ara f -(1→ ( Makarova and Shakhmatov, 2020 , Chen et al, 2019 ), →3)- α- d -Gal p -(1→ ( Jing et al, 2014 , Li et al, 2021 , Siwińska et al, 2020 ), →4)- α- d -Xyl p -(1→ ( He et al, 2013 ), →2)- α- d -Xyl p - (1→ ( Makarova, & Shakhmatov, 2021 ), →2,4)- α- d -Man p -(1→ ( Roslund et al, 2011 , Song et al, 2019 ), →3)- α- l -Rha p -(1→ ( Bellich et al, 2021 ), →6)- α- d -Gal p -(1→ ( Cui et al, 2007 , Pramanik et al, 2005 ), T- α- d -Gal p -(1→ ( Zhang et al, 2021b ), →3)- α- d -Fuc p -(1→ ( Liu et al, 2021b , Szpakowska et al, 2020 ), and T- β- d -Glc p -(1→ ( Li et al, 2020 , Wang and Guo, 2020 ), respectively. The signals in the upfield at δ H / δ C 1.15–1.25/16.5–18.5 ppm confirmed the presence of fucose and rhamnose.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%