2021 28th Conference of Open Innovations Association (FRUCT) 2021
DOI: 10.23919/fruct50888.2021.9347604
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Full Reference Video Quality Assessment Metric on Base Human Visual System Consistent with PSNR

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Various full reference VQA parameters are listed in previous studies. [41][42][43] Following are different VQA metrics evaluated for video transmission over OWC-PON architecture:…”
Section: System Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Various full reference VQA parameters are listed in previous studies. [41][42][43] Following are different VQA metrics evaluated for video transmission over OWC-PON architecture:…”
Section: System Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The full reference VQA 42 considers undistorted image as ground truth reference and compares it with the output image from system under consideration. Various full reference VQA parameters are listed in previous studies 41–43 . Following are different VQA metrics evaluated for video transmission over OWC‐PON architecture: Mean square error (MSE): For a video sequence having F frames, MSE 44 is defined as follows: eitalicMSE=1Fn=1F1italicMNx=1My=1N()trueFn̂()x,ygoodbreak−Fn()x,y2 where Fntruêx,y is the distorted n th frame and Fnx,y is the reference n th frame.…”
Section: System Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alongside compression and data transmission, accurate quality estimation is key to maximising use of bandwidth while also maximising the user experience. Video quality methods can be divided into two categories: subjective and objective quality assessment criteria [1]. The human user is typically the final recipient in typical video processing applications, so subjective quality criteria that reflects human visual perception is arguably the more important method of assessing video quality [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, popular objective prediction models correlate poorly with subjective perceptions of quality by the human visual system (HVS) and depend on the systems or processes involved [2]. On the other hand, there are algorithmically complex video quality metrics (VQM) based on models of the human visual system [1], [3] , and an open question is whether complex video quality metrics based on models of the human visual system provide significantly better predictions than objective metrics. Another problem when used of visual models, is in developing video quality metrics we must represent the HVS in software, a task impeded by the limited new fundamental knowledge of the HVS perception of video content using modern equipment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation