2019
DOI: 10.1002/aws2.1136
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Full‐scale demonstration testing of hexavalent chromium reduction via stannous chloride application

Abstract: The best available technologies for hexavalent chromium [Cr(VI)] treatment can be cost prohibitive and operationally complex. Direct stannous [Sn(II)] chloride application to reduce Cr(VI) to trivalent chromium is an alternative treatment approach that could substantially decrease treatment costs. A full‐scale demonstration was conducted at the Coachella Valley Water District to investigate the ability of Sn(II) to reduce Cr(VI) in a chlorinated groundwater system. An average Sn(II) dose of 0.5 mg‐Sn/L, which … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…), to trivalent chromium (Cr(III)), presumably precipitating it as chromium hydroxide (Cr(OH) 3 (s)). On the oxidation side of the reaction, stannous tin (Sn(II)) is converted to stannic tin (Sn(IV)), presumably precipitating as stannic oxide (SnO 2 (s)) (Brandhuber et al, 2004;Henrie et al, 2019;Kennedy et al, 2018). SnCl 2 for Cr(VI) treatment emerged from bench-scale work by Lai and McNeill (2006) and Brandhuber et al (2004), but somewhat unsatisfactory and ambiguous results led to a hiatus in the published literature until recent studies were published by Henrie et al (2019) and Kennedy et al (2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…), to trivalent chromium (Cr(III)), presumably precipitating it as chromium hydroxide (Cr(OH) 3 (s)). On the oxidation side of the reaction, stannous tin (Sn(II)) is converted to stannic tin (Sn(IV)), presumably precipitating as stannic oxide (SnO 2 (s)) (Brandhuber et al, 2004;Henrie et al, 2019;Kennedy et al, 2018). SnCl 2 for Cr(VI) treatment emerged from bench-scale work by Lai and McNeill (2006) and Brandhuber et al (2004), but somewhat unsatisfactory and ambiguous results led to a hiatus in the published literature until recent studies were published by Henrie et al (2019) and Kennedy et al (2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To overcome the disadvantages of over-stoichiometric addition of chemicals and secondary waste generation, a new chemical reductive treatment has recently been developed based on divalent tin Sn(II) addition as the chemical of stannous chloride SnCl 2 . The following redox reaction takes place (Henrie et al, 2019;Kennedy et al, 2020):…”
Section: Sn(ii)-based Reductive Cr(vi) Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A cartridge filtration unit with pore sizes of 0.45 µm has been demonstrated to successfully remove Cr(III) residual solids. In the final treated drinking water coming out the filtration unit, the addition of free chlorine with a contact time of 15 days did not generate Cr(VI), indicating the combination of Sn(II) reductive treatment and subsequent microfiltration or porous media filtration is effective in removing Cr(VI) and total chromium (Henrie et al, 2019).…”
Section: Challenges and Future Outlookmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Besides ferrous salts, stannous salts (in powder or liquid form) have been extensively employed for the chemical reduction of Cr(VI) to Cr (III) [44], which proceeds according to Eq. ( 1):…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%