2019
DOI: 10.1155/2019/7646094
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Full‐Scale Experimental Investigation of the Static and Dynamic Stiffness of Prestressed Concrete Girders

Abstract: Cracking damage influences the stiffness of the girders. Many articles in the literatures have studied the development of stiffness of the scale-down model; however, full-scale model testing cannot be completely replaced by scale-down testing because of material component characteristics and boundary effects. This paper deals with the effects of cracking damage on the structural static and dynamic stiffness based on three prestressed concrete (PC) girders which were removed from an old bridge. First, the equiv… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The bending stiffness of the cracked section is reduced by γsEI (γs is the degradation coefficient of the bending stiffness), whereas the bending stiffness in the uncracked sections does not change under a load, as shown in Fig. 1(b) 19 .…”
Section: Bending Stiffness Of Beam With Cracksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The bending stiffness of the cracked section is reduced by γsEI (γs is the degradation coefficient of the bending stiffness), whereas the bending stiffness in the uncracked sections does not change under a load, as shown in Fig. 1(b) 19 .…”
Section: Bending Stiffness Of Beam With Cracksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reason for this is that the tensile strength of UHPC is much greater than that of ordinary concrete, and after a crack is created, the energy to create a new crack is greater than the energy to continue the development of the crack, which is called the “energy-based crack development principle”.
Figure 4.Schematic diagram of cracks in prestressed UHPC composite beams: (a) Cracking load stage, (b) Pre-ultimate load stage, (c) Failure stage.
Figure 5.Diagram of crack development in the field.
Figure 6.Diagram of main bending cracks.
Figure 7.Diagram of penetrating cracks.
Figure 8.Schematic diagram of cracks in prestressed ordinary concrete: (a) The maximum crack width is 0.6 mm, (b) The maximum crack width is 1.0 mm, (c) The maximum crack width is 1.3 mm. (Zhou et al, 2020).
…”
Section: Prestressed Ultra-high Performance Concrete - Reinforced Con...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Schematic diagram of cracks in prestressed ordinary concrete: (a) The maximum crack width is 0.6 mm, (b) The maximum crack width is 1.0 mm, (c) The maximum crack width is 1.3 mm. (Zhou et al, 2020). …”
Section: Prestressed Ultra-high Performance Concrete - Reinforced Con...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…At the beginning of the 21st century, Chinese scholars gradually began to use full-scale model tests to conduct research on the evaluation and maintenance of concrete bridges. A full-scale model test study on three 30 m prestressed concrete box girder was carried out [8], and the results show that the initial damage condition infuences the statistical distribution characteristic parameters of cracks in the box girder after loading. Te stifness decay law of the full-scale test and the scaled-scale model test is not the same.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%