2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-21503-3_62
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Full-Scale Fatigue Testing from a Structural Analysis Perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For older aircraft designed according to the safe life approach, it is a common practice to carry out a Full-Scale Fatigue Test (FSFT) to verify the possibility of introducing the damage tolerance approach [9][10][11]. The most comprehensive fatigue test is the actual usage, but due to possible critical damage FSFT are commonly used in order to predict any possible cracking [10][11][12][13] before the aircraft is certified to roll out. As with most tests FSFT is a representation of the actual service load conditions [14,15] and simplifies the complexity of the actual load spectrum by neglecting some effects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For older aircraft designed according to the safe life approach, it is a common practice to carry out a Full-Scale Fatigue Test (FSFT) to verify the possibility of introducing the damage tolerance approach [9][10][11]. The most comprehensive fatigue test is the actual usage, but due to possible critical damage FSFT are commonly used in order to predict any possible cracking [10][11][12][13] before the aircraft is certified to roll out. As with most tests FSFT is a representation of the actual service load conditions [14,15] and simplifies the complexity of the actual load spectrum by neglecting some effects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, due to discrete load application FSFT may cause some local effects that are absent from actual service. That said, the load spectrum used in FSFT is usually developed from a welldefined flight profile [9][10][11][12], which is basically a good representation of actual operation loads. Nevertheless, it may differ between individual aircraft or from future operational loads of the whole fleet.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fatigue cracks are one of the most common factors (beside corrosion) influencing structural integrity of aging aircraft over the course of operation (Daverschot et al, 2020;B. G. Nesterenko, Nesterenko, Konovalov, & Senik, 2020;Balicki, Głowacki, & Uchanin, 2021;Loroch, 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In aerospace, the beginnings of system solutions focused on a high level of safety date back to the early post-war years, when the safe-life design concept was introduced, in order to preserve human health and life as well as mitigating potential material losses [ 2 , 3 ]. Due to the advancement of aircraft structures, complexity of different types of connections and variable geometry of structural elements, the most reliable method for determining the service life is the subcomponent or full scale fatigue tests of aircraft structures [ 4 , 5 , 6 ]. After the F-111 aircraft crash in 1969 [ 7 , 8 ], a new design and maintenance concept was introduced—the damage tolerance approach [ 9 , 10 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%