2014
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)gm.1943-5622.0000272
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Full-Scale Instrumented Testing and Three-Dimensional Modeling of Airfield Matting Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A finite element model (e.g. approach in reference Doyle et al, 2014) could enhance determination of the critical location and magnitude of limiting stresses/strains and improve effectiveness of the investigation.…”
Section: Prediction Model Comparisonsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A finite element model (e.g. approach in reference Doyle et al, 2014) could enhance determination of the critical location and magnitude of limiting stresses/strains and improve effectiveness of the investigation.…”
Section: Prediction Model Comparisonsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The equations showed strong correlations to the measured data in terms of passes and deformation but were only applicable when the subgrade CBR, mat type, and applied load were similar to the testing conditions. In Doyle et al (2014) compared stress predictions using FE methods to those measured from earth pressure cells installed in full-scale test sections described by Gartrell et al (2009). The authors found that FE showed potential for improving the ability to predict damage to the subgrade and mat system; however, more information from full-scale testing was required to further calibrate the model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Full-scale instrumented test section data for two of the matting systems evaluated in this paper and mats tested by Anderton and Gartrell (2005) were included in the Gonzalez and Rushing (2010) data set. Doyle et al (2014) performed three-dimensional finite element analysis (FEA) on instrumented test sections described by Gartrell (2007) and Anderton and Gartrell (2005) using measured EPC data.…”
Section: Airfield Matting Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…was determined using the back-calculation procedure described by Gonzalez and Rushing (2010) and the test setup described by Berney et al (2006), where a single panel was simply supported and loaded incrementally while deflection was measured at four locations (similar to a four point bending test). Note that (Doyle et al, 2014;Berney et al, 2006) and , although determined using different back-calculation methods, are conceptually the same term and aim to characterize the matting panels' resistance to deflection. The remainder of this section describes each matting system separately.…”
Section: Materials Testedmentioning
confidence: 99%