Full-scale failure tests of bridges play an important role in the better understanding of the behaviour of bridges and in the development of assessment methods. Such experiments are challenging and often expansive and, thus, are rare. This paper provides a review of failure tests on concrete bridges with a focus on the learning outcomes from the tests. In total, 40 failure tests have been identified for 28 bridges. Various types of bridges have been studied, involving bridge decks composed of slabs, girders and combinations thereof. There are examples of both reinforced concrete (RC) and prestressed concrete (PC) decks. In general, the tests indicated conservative estimates of the load-carrying capacity using theoretical calculations based on methods traditionally used for design and assessment. It can also be concluded that almost a third of the experiments resulted in unexpected failures, mainly shear instead of flexure. It also seems that inaccurate representation of geometry, boundary conditions and materials often explains the differences between the theoretical and the tested capacity.