I think that many of us chose a career in engineering because we like solving technical problems, and we like solving technical problems by experimenting and finding solutions that are better than the ones we have used before. 'Better', in this context, could mean many things; longer, taller, slenderer, stronger, more durable, less disruptive, better looking, more economical, safer, more sustainable. This intrinsic drive to innovate is of course not just a self-serving demonstration of engineering prowess and flair. The demand for improved infrastructure and the ever-increasing expectations from society require engineers to remain innovative, challenge traditional thinking and go beyond established practices.This issue of Bridge Engineering contains five interesting papers. They cover newly built and existing bridges and general asset management but innovation is a common element to all. They demonstrate how innovative thinking can enhance our solutions and lead ultimately to delivering better value to our clients and society; be that producing a more efficient design, finding hidden reserves of strength in an aging bridge or optimising the maintenance spend across a network of structures. The five papers are from Sweden, the UK, Ireland, Japan and China. It is welcome to see papers from different countries. This is testament to the wide international appeal of Bridge Engineering and the standing of the journal among practising and research engineers worldwide.In the first paper, Häggström et al. (2017) describe the full-scale testing of an old steel truss railway bridge to failure. It is not often that bridge engineers have the opportunity to test a real bridge to destruction and witness its behaviour near and at failure. Besides the obvious thrill from the exercise, such tests can provide valuable insight into the behaviour of a real structure, its actual ultimate capacity and failure mechanisms. The findings can then be applied in the assessment of similar bridges. When the Åby Bridge in northern Sweden was replaced by a new bridge, it was placed on temporary supports alongside its original position and loaded to failure by two hydraulic jacks with cables anchored in bedrock. The authors describe the test and the accompanying numerical analysis, including comparison of the findings with a previous assessment to the Swedish assessment standard. Hendy et al. (2017) describe the design of Walton Bridge, a new arch road bridge over the River Thames. The two inclined steel arch ribs have a hexagonal cross-section and support the ladder deck on steel bar hangers. The paper provides a general overview of the design, followed by a more detailed account of two particular challenges that the designers had to tackle in order to produce a design that is both safe and efficient. The first issue relates to the section classification and resistance of the hexagonal shaped arch ribs that are made up of curved plates. The second issue relates to the fatigue and toughness properties of the steel bar hangers. The paper describe...