2002
DOI: 10.1007/bf02482111
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Full-scale tests on rectangular hollow bridge piers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Han et al [6] conducted cyclic test on 5 pier specimens to investigate the seismic performance of reinforced concrete (RC) bridge piers. Yeh et al [7] studied the seismic performance by conducting cyclic tests on 3 prototype piers. Xia et al [8] carried out biaxial quasistatic tests on 14 reinforced concrete thin-walled piers and the seismic properties were studied in detail.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Han et al [6] conducted cyclic test on 5 pier specimens to investigate the seismic performance of reinforced concrete (RC) bridge piers. Yeh et al [7] studied the seismic performance by conducting cyclic tests on 3 prototype piers. Xia et al [8] carried out biaxial quasistatic tests on 14 reinforced concrete thin-walled piers and the seismic properties were studied in detail.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Calvi et al [4] focused on some relevant aspects of the damage development and collapse modes of hollow piers, such as absence of confinement, inadequate shear strength, shifting of the critical section, and insufficient length of lap splices. Mo et al [5][6][7][8] and Pinto et al [9] studied the seismic performance of hollow rectangular section RC piers and gave the corresponding prediction models of seismic response of these piers according to the design codes of the authors' country. Cassese et al [10,11] designed and realized four concrete bridge piers with a hollow rectangular section with different shear span-to-section depth ratios to test the seismic performance of existing piers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All existing models in the literature for analyzing bridge piers can be broadly classified into three categories, namely, distributed and lumped plastic hinge models, hysteretic models and the classic finite element models (Liu et al , 2015). Of these three categories of models, the classic finite element models based on fiber cross-section and non-linear beam–column elements developed by researchers (Chan, 1982; Scordelis, 1984; Spacone et al , 1996) are widely used because they are very effective in predicting the flexural behavior of RC members under seismic loading (Ceresa et al , 2007; Ceresa et al , 2009; Ferreira et al , 2014; Brunesi and Nascimbene, 2014; Wijesundara et al , 2014). However, these elements are not very effective in predicting the shear behavior of RC members.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%