2014
DOI: 10.1093/gji/ggt518
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Full sphere hydrodynamic and dynamo benchmarks

Abstract: Convection in planetary cores can generate fluid flow and magnetic fields, and a number of sophisticated codes exist to simulate the dynamical behaviour of such systems. We report on the first community activity to compare numerical results of computer codes designed to calculate fluid flow within a whole sphere. The flows are incompressible and rapidly rotating and the forcing of the flow is either due to thermal convection or due to moving boundaries. All problems defined have solutions that allow easy compa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
44
0
5

Year Published

2015
2015
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
44
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…This Poisson equation is solved with the algebraic multigrid method BoomerAMG (Henson & Yang 2002). Discussions regarding the performance of this code can be found in Marti et al (2014) and Cébron et al (2014).…”
Section: Numerical Validation and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This Poisson equation is solved with the algebraic multigrid method BoomerAMG (Henson & Yang 2002). Discussions regarding the performance of this code can be found in Marti et al (2014) and Cébron et al (2014).…”
Section: Numerical Validation and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the XSHELLS code, these instabilities are suppressed by truncating the spherical harmonic degree at l tr (r) = 1 + r/r s l max with r s = 0.5. The XSHELLS code passes benchmarks designed to highlight issues arising at the origin (Marti et al, 2014).…”
Section: Numerics In Spheresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The numerical code has been widely benchmarked in several contexts including that of precession driven flows 32,38 . We use a typical truncation of the spectral expansion up to N = 63, L = M = 127 at moderate Ekman numbers (E 3 × 10 −5 ).…”
Section: B Numerical Solvermentioning
confidence: 99%