2016
DOI: 10.1190/geo2015-0353.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Full-traveltime inversion

et al.

Abstract: Many previously published wave-equation-based methods, which attempt to automatically invert traveltime or kinematic information in seismic data or migrated gathers for smooth velocities, suffer a common and severe problem — the inversions are involuntarily and unconsciously hijacked by amplitude information. To overcome this problem, we have developed a new wave-equation-based traveltime inversion methodology, referred to as full-traveltime (i.e., fully dependent on traveltime) inversion (FTI), to automatical… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The proposed method assumes that the migration velocity is accurate enough so that the tilted events in time-shift gathers can become flat after the transformation with the method proposed by Xu et al (2014). When the migration velocity is not correct, it is possible to combine the proposed method with velocity model building methods that are based on time-shift gathers (Yang and Sava 2011;Luo et al 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed method assumes that the migration velocity is accurate enough so that the tilted events in time-shift gathers can become flat after the transformation with the method proposed by Xu et al (2014). When the migration velocity is not correct, it is possible to combine the proposed method with velocity model building methods that are based on time-shift gathers (Yang and Sava 2011;Luo et al 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It shows that the Born-based gradients fail to distinguish whether the background velocity is slower or faster than the true one. Then we apply the FTI theory (Luo et al, 2016), that assumes the velocity perturbation only causes the traveltime shifts of waveforms, on our objective function equation (1). The FTI-based adjoint source is ( , = 0, ) ∫ ( , = 0, ) 2 ( , ) ( , ) .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The misfit function in the conventional FWI relies on the absolute waveform matching between synthetic data and observed data, and cycle skipping issue can easily occur if there is a significant phase and/or amplitude difference. Studies of seeking more convex function include the wave-equation traveltime based misfit function (Luo and Schuster, 1991;Luo et al, 2016), the envelope-based misfit function (Wu et al, 2014;Chi et al, 2014), the instantaneous-phase-based misfit function (Bozdag et al, 2011;Jiao et al, 2015), the correlation-based misfit function (Van Leeuwen and Mulder, 2010;Luo and Sava, 2011;Chi et al, 2015;Choi and Alkhalifah, 2016), the deconvolution-based misfit function (Luo and Sava, 2011;Warner and Guasch, 2016), the dynamic-time-warping-based misfit function (Ma and Hale, 2013), the Huber-norm misfit function (Guitton and Symes, 2003;Ha et al, 2009), and the optimal transport approach (Métivier et al, 2016a,b;Yang et al, 2017Yang et al, , 2018, etc. These misfit functions are generally more convex with respect to model perturbations, and therefore less prone to the cycle skipping issue.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%