2020
DOI: 10.1039/d0lc00675k
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fully-automated and field-deployable blood leukocyte separation platform using multi-dimensional double spiral (MDDS) inertial microfluidics

Abstract: A fully-automated and portable leukocyte separation platform was developed based on a new type of inertial microfluidic device, multi-dimensional double spiral (MDDS) device, as an alternative to centrifugation. By combining...

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
66
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
0
66
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Inertial microfluidics as a size-based separation method is suitable for isolating WBCs from blood samples owing to the relatively distinct size difference in different blood cell types. Many previous studies utilized inertial microfluidic designs to directly sort WBCs from blood [30][31][32]. However, they only demonstrated sorting of 3 μm [31], 5 μm [30], or even 6 μm [32] diameter cells from 10 μm diameter ones regardless of the subpopulations of WBCs such as lymphocytes with an average size of only 7 μm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Inertial microfluidics as a size-based separation method is suitable for isolating WBCs from blood samples owing to the relatively distinct size difference in different blood cell types. Many previous studies utilized inertial microfluidic designs to directly sort WBCs from blood [30][31][32]. However, they only demonstrated sorting of 3 μm [31], 5 μm [30], or even 6 μm [32] diameter cells from 10 μm diameter ones regardless of the subpopulations of WBCs such as lymphocytes with an average size of only 7 μm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many previous studies utilized inertial microfluidic designs to directly sort WBCs from blood [30][31][32]. However, they only demonstrated sorting of 3 μm [31], 5 μm [30], or even 6 μm [32] diameter cells from 10 μm diameter ones regardless of the subpopulations of WBCs such as lymphocytes with an average size of only 7 μm. Considering the complete population of WBCs during blood assessment can reflect a more accurate heath situation [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2a) in the original PDMS MDDS device and the plastic MDDS device, respectively, under the same flow rate condition of 9.2 mL min −1 (2.3 mL min −1 ×4 for the quad-version); 2.3 mL min −1 is the optimized flow rate condition of the original PDMS MDDS device for blood separation as well as particle separation. 39 The results clearly show that the plastic MDDS device has a smaller dimension than the actual dimension of the original PDMS device that is deformed under pressure. Particles experienced a higher lift force so that the trajectory of 6 μm particles was shifted closer to the inner wall compared to the PDMS device.…”
Section: Analysis Of Channel Deformation In the Pdms Spiral Devicesmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…To overcome the limitations in the PDMS device, we developed deformation-free and mass-producible plastic inertial microfluidic systems (Fig. 1c), where we previously optimized PDMS inertial devices for blood separation 39 and Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cell retention, [40][41][42] respectively. In inertial microfluidics, the channel dimension (especially the height of the channel) is a critical parameter determining the particle focusing in the channel by affecting particleexperienced forces (lift and Dean drag forces).…”
Section: Overview Of the Plastic Spiral Inertial Microfluidic Devicementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation