2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.alcohol.2021.04.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fully automated correction for the hematocrit bias of non-volumetric dried blood spot phosphatidylethanol analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of DBS sampling in combination with DBS autosamplers overcomes some of the aforementioned challenges and permits fully automated analysis of PEth in combination with nondestructive HCT assessment and correction, using single‐wave reflectance spectroscopy, within about 5 min per sample (Luginbühl, Fischer, et al, 2020; Luginbühl, Gaugler, et al, 2019; Luginbühl, Stöth, et al, 2020). This represents a significant advantage, as large batches of samples can be processed in a fully automated manner, “from card to chromatogram, with no hands‐on.”…”
Section: Evolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The use of DBS sampling in combination with DBS autosamplers overcomes some of the aforementioned challenges and permits fully automated analysis of PEth in combination with nondestructive HCT assessment and correction, using single‐wave reflectance spectroscopy, within about 5 min per sample (Luginbühl, Fischer, et al, 2020; Luginbühl, Gaugler, et al, 2019; Luginbühl, Stöth, et al, 2020). This represents a significant advantage, as large batches of samples can be processed in a fully automated manner, “from card to chromatogram, with no hands‐on.”…”
Section: Evolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter is not easy to obtain in routine practice and might be less preferred. Alternatively, one can estimate the erythrocyte fraction of the whole blood by measuring (or predicting) the HCT (in conventional blood samples or in dried blood samples), followed by a normalization of the PEth concentrations by applying certain correction algorithms (Luginbühl, Stöth, et al, 2020), similar to the analysis of creatinine in urine and the normalization of analyte concentrations thereafter (Cone et al, 2009; Viau et al, 2004). Thereby, a decision has to be made on how to reference the HCT values for PEth: For example, there is the possibility to define HCT intervals in which obtained results are “acceptable” and do not require any HCT‐related conversion, to reference to a common HCT for all samples (e.g., 40%), or to reference to the gender mean, with the normal range for male subjects at 40.7%–50.3% (Kehat et al, 2003) being distinct from that of female subjects at 36.1%–44.3% (Groves et al, 2016).…”
Section: Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The direct alcohol marker phosphatidylethanol is an example of such an analyte; it accumulates in the RBC fraction, showing a linear HCT dependence and yields the same results via venous blood analysis and capillary DBS analysis. 23,24 When preparing and measuring an HCT calibration from authentic samples containing the analyte (mixing RBC fraction and plasma), the analyte's HCT dependency can be assessed and normalized together with HCT area and recovery biases. However, this approach does not compensate for differences between venous blood analysis and capillary blood DBS analysis.…”
Section: Hct Calibration Based On Authentic Analyte-positive Bloodmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An initial evaluation of the module by Luginbühl et al yielded promising results 21 and a first application was to use the obtained Hct values to perform a Hct correction of phosphatidylethanol concentrations in DBS. 22 However, as these evaluations only encompassed a limited number ( n = 6) of non-clinical samples, it remained to be demonstrated whether automated reflectance-based Hct prediction of DBS can robustly and universally generate reliable results. In addition, it remained unclear whether each end-user would be required to individually set up and validate their own calibration model (which would limit the potential of routine implementation), and to what extent measurement or DBS variables may impact the result.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%