2021
DOI: 10.1109/tmi.2020.3024264
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fully Automatic Calibration of Tumor-Growth Models Using a Single mpMRI Scan

Abstract: Our objective is the calibration of mathematical tumor growth models from a single multiparametric scan. The target problem is the analysis of preoperative Glioblastoma (GBM) scans. To this end, we present a fully automatic tumor-growth calibration methodology that integrates a single-species reaction-diffusion partial differential equation (PDE) model for tumor progression with multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (mpMRI) scans to robustly extract patient specific biomarkers i.e., estimates for (i) the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mathematical models of cancer define a forward problem, whose solution provides state variables (e.g., tumor cell density). In general, these models are parameterized by unknown biophysical parameters (and possibly initial conditions) that typically manifest substantial variability across subjects [68,75,98]. The estimation of these unknown variables (also called inversion variables) should be patient-specific and can be mathematically posed as an inverse problem, which aims at optimizing an objective function constrained by the model.…”
Section: Calibrating Image-based Mathematical Oncology Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Mathematical models of cancer define a forward problem, whose solution provides state variables (e.g., tumor cell density). In general, these models are parameterized by unknown biophysical parameters (and possibly initial conditions) that typically manifest substantial variability across subjects [68,75,98]. The estimation of these unknown variables (also called inversion variables) should be patient-specific and can be mathematically posed as an inverse problem, which aims at optimizing an objective function constrained by the model.…”
Section: Calibrating Image-based Mathematical Oncology Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biophysical inversion is a promising strategy to calibrate predictive models of cancer, but also presents several challenges. Complex, typically nonlinear and time-dependent, PDE-based models often result in ill-conditioned and non-convex optimization problems, which require sophisticated numerical algorithms to stabilize the inversion, such as multiresolution continuation, parameter continuation, and regularization schemes [29,98,99,104]. Data scarcity can exacerbate the ill-posedness.…”
Section: Barriers To Successmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [7], the authors consider a Bayesian framework for estimating model parameters but do not consider mass effect and use a single seed for tumor initial condition. The absence of mass effect in the tumor models allows for the use of simiplistic precancer brain approximations through deformed templates (computed by deformable registration) [7] or simple tissue replacement strategies [16]. Other than those works, the current state of the art for single-scan biophysicallybased tumor characterization is GLISTR [15].…”
Section: B Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mismatch terms are balanced by a regularization term on the inverted initial condition (IC). O is an observation operator that defines the clearly observable tumor margin (see §II-D for its definition; for additional details see [16]). Following [5], we introduce two additional constraints to our optimization problem-Eq.…”
Section: B Inverse Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation