2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.compmedimag.2020.101786
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fully automatic segmentation of right and left ventricle on short-axis cardiac MRI images

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 6 illustrates the performance comparison of the proposed ES‐FCN model with the existing methods in terms of Jaccard indices. The ES‐FCN model attains the jaccard index of 0.948 for ACDC dataset which is greater than the existing models such as 34,35 . The ES‐FCN model improves the overall Jaccard indices of 10.6% and 13.8% better than Regression‐based method 34 and Pre‐trained neural network 35 for ACDC dataset.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Table 6 illustrates the performance comparison of the proposed ES‐FCN model with the existing methods in terms of Jaccard indices. The ES‐FCN model attains the jaccard index of 0.948 for ACDC dataset which is greater than the existing models such as 34,35 . The ES‐FCN model improves the overall Jaccard indices of 10.6% and 13.8% better than Regression‐based method 34 and Pre‐trained neural network 35 for ACDC dataset.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The ES-FCN model attains the jaccard index of 0.948 for ACDC dataset which is greater than the existing models such as. 34,35 The ES-FCN model improves the overall Jaccard indices of 10.6% and 13.8% better than Regression-based method 34 and Pre-trained neural network 35 for ACDC dataset. The proposed model obtains the jaccard index of 0.947 for LVSV dataset, which is greater than the existing models such as.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Acdc Datasetmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…While it is unlear if this could be related to adding new sequences, overall this data suggests that experience may not decrease scan times or interpretation times. The survey’s results also highlight the need to develop faster scanning techniques and automated image analysis to maximize efficiency [ 23 25 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Critically, DL-based segmentation tools are often trained and tested on images from single clinical centers, using one vendor with a well-defined protocol resulting in homogenous datasets ( 59 , 60 ). Furthermore, CMR protocols across prominent multi-center cohort studies are also standardized, prohibiting wider generalizability ( 5 , 61 , 62 ). A notable effort to develop segmentation tools on more heterogeneous datasets to promote robust AI tool development is the Multi-Center, Multi-Vendor and Multi-Disease Cardiac Segmentation (M&Ms) Challenge ( 63 ).…”
Section: Unintended Consequences Of Ai Applications In Cardiovascular...mentioning
confidence: 99%