2016
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.93.043410
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fully efficient time-parallelized quantum optimal control algorithm

Abstract: We present a time-parallelization method that enables to accelerate the computation of quantum optimal control algorithms. We show that this approach is approximately fully efficient when based on a gradient method as optimization solver: the computational time is approximately divided by the number of available processors. The control of spin systems, molecular orientation and BoseEinstein condensates are used as illustrative examples to highlight the wide range of application of this numerical scheme.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
15
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
3
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For α = 1000, the bounding disc is identical to the previous case; however, since we have L < αL 0 for all cases except for σ = −16, we observe no eigenvalue outside the disc, except for the very last case. In that very last case, we have |δγ| = 0.0107, so (48) gives the lower bound µ * > −1.07 × 10 −5 , which again is quite accurate when compared with the bottom right panel of Figure 4. Re(µ) Re(µ) Note that the inequality (48) is valid for all L > 0, i.e., regardless of whether the isolated eigenvalue µ * exists.…”
Section: Eigenvalue Problemsupporting
confidence: 53%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…For α = 1000, the bounding disc is identical to the previous case; however, since we have L < αL 0 for all cases except for σ = −16, we observe no eigenvalue outside the disc, except for the very last case. In that very last case, we have |δγ| = 0.0107, so (48) gives the lower bound µ * > −1.07 × 10 −5 , which again is quite accurate when compared with the bottom right panel of Figure 4. Re(µ) Re(µ) Note that the inequality (48) is valid for all L > 0, i.e., regardless of whether the isolated eigenvalue µ * exists.…”
Section: Eigenvalue Problemsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…Therefore, a multiple shooting approach allows us to deal with local subproblems on shorter time horizons, where we obtain faster convergence. Such convergence enhancement has also been observed in [3,37,38], and also more recently in [48]. Secondly, if we use parareal to parallelize the forward and backward sweeps, then the speedup ratio will be bounded above by L/K, where L is the number of sub-intervals and K is the number of parareal iterations required for convergence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 61%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It follows from Equation (26) (45) Pulse amplitudes and frequencies enter this equation linearly and may therefore be optimised by the GRAPE procedure [82], as well as its recent enhancements [81,84,85]. The first group of control operators consists of…”
Section: Potential Further Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%