2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.surneu.2009.04.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fully endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery for functioning pituitary adenomas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
34
1
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 154 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
34
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The efficacy of the endoscopic TSA for the management of pituitary tumors has been reported in the literature, with results and complication rates at least comparable with microsurgical series (Table 3)12,17,28). A meta-analysis of eleven published studies revealed no difference in endocrinological remission rate of functioning adenomas (60% versus 66%) and complete tumor removal rate (69% versus 71%) between microscopic and endoscopic TSA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…The efficacy of the endoscopic TSA for the management of pituitary tumors has been reported in the literature, with results and complication rates at least comparable with microsurgical series (Table 3)12,17,28). A meta-analysis of eleven published studies revealed no difference in endocrinological remission rate of functioning adenomas (60% versus 66%) and complete tumor removal rate (69% versus 71%) between microscopic and endoscopic TSA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Meta-analyses comparing endoscopic and microscopic pituitary surgery have been inconclusive; several studies report improved short-term endocrine remission and fewer complications (except for CSF leaks), particularly for patients with functioning adenomas. 9,30 Rotenberg et al demonstrated that endoscopic surgery afforded fewer complications, shorter hospital stays and greater patient comfort. 25 There is a consistent lack of evidence, however, that endoscopic surgery leads to higher rates of GTR.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…report that in 381 patients who received endoscopic endonasal surgery, complication rates were similar or less than the complication rates of microscopic pituitary surgery reported in the literature, and tumor removal was superior for endosellar lesions with endoscopic surgery [207]. Regarding endocrinologic outcomes, in one study comparing the two techniques in two series of patients operated upon by the same surgeon, the hypersecretion remission rate, or cure rate, for the endonasal approach was 63% compared with 50% with microsurgery, and the cure rate difference was most notable in grade II tumors (78% endoscopic vs 43% microsurgical) [208]. Similarly, Kabil and colleagues reported a 90% cure rate overall in their retrospective review of 300 patients who received endoscopic endonasal pituitary tumor resection compared with a microsurgical cure rate of 66–82% in the literature [209214].…”
Section: Open Craniotomy Versus Microsurgical Versus Endoscopic Endonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… † Major surgical complications only CS: Case series; E: Endoscopic approach; M Microsurgical approach. Data taken from [194,207,208,210,215217,219]. …”
Section: Tablementioning
confidence: 99%