2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2020.103396
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fully resolved simulation of dense suspensions of freely evolving buoyant particles using an improved immersed boundary method

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
2
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For spherical particles, Schwarz et al propose to use = 0.5 referring to the added mass coefficient of submerged spheres 45 . In our case, values of 0.5 or 1 were found to be suitable, which also satisfy the condition of a lower limit recently reported by Tavanashad et al 58 .…”
Section: Virtual Mass Correction For the Lbmsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For spherical particles, Schwarz et al propose to use = 0.5 referring to the added mass coefficient of submerged spheres 45 . In our case, values of 0.5 or 1 were found to be suitable, which also satisfy the condition of a lower limit recently reported by Tavanashad et al 58 .…”
Section: Virtual Mass Correction For the Lbmsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…In a recent work, Tavanashad et al 58 discussed the constant more extensively and established a lower positive limit for , depending on the density ratio and the added mass coefficient. Our choice of is in line with this limit.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For spherical particles, Schwarz et al propose to use C v = 0.5 referring to the added mass coefficient of submerged spheres. 45 In our case, values of 0.5 or 1 were found to be suitable, which also satisfy the condition of a lower limit recently reported by Tavanashad et al 59 In Equation ( 17) the derivative of the translational particle velocity appears on either side of the equation. Physically, this is well justified, as the effect induced by the virtual mass should be exactly suppressed by the counteracting force.…”
supporting
confidence: 83%
“…These arguments will be revisited in Section 5, where the VM-MEM-LBM again serves to simulate a sphere at p = 0.001 and results are compared to literature. In a recent work, Tavanashad et al 59 discussed the constant C v more extensively and established a lower positive limit for C v , depending on the density ratio and the added mass coefficient. Our choice of C v is in line with this limit.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most recently, Tavanashad and Subramaniam [31] proposed a FR-DNSbased drag law for buoyant particle suspensions which are a good approximation to spherical bubbles in contaminated liquid [32][33][34]. They showed that with proper scaling, the drag of buoyant particles is comparable with the drag of bubbles in clean liquid [35,36].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%