2020
DOI: 10.32942/osf.io/tkqz2
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Function of a multimodal signal: a multiple-hypotheses test using an electromechanical robot

Abstract: 1. Many animal species communicate using multimodal signals, which are composed of two or more components emitted and interpreted through different sensory modalities. The main types of selective pressures leading to the evolution of multimodal signals are: (1) content-based, when combined components convey information about the signaller, (2) efficacy-based, when combined components increase the efficacy of signal transmission or processing, and (3) inter-signal interaction, when combined components act in co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 25 publications
(50 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Examples include work that experimentally manipulated acoustic signals perceived by field crickets, where the presence or absence of the signal in nature is known to be controlled by a naturally segregating variant (Bailey and Zuk 2012;Pascoal et al 2016). Technical innovations in other systems might facilitate such an approach when information about the genetic basis of traits is known or estimable, and include techniques such as video behavioral playbacks in fish such as the guppy Poecilia reticulata (Woo and Rieucau 2011), electromechanically-controlled sexual signaling behavior in robotic neotropical frogs (Crossodactylus schmidti) (Caldart et al 2020), robotic sage grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus) in which variation in female sexual receptivity can be simulated (Perry et al 2019), or experimentally manipulated body marks (Velando et al 2013). associated with large partner larvae and vice versa.…”
Section: Perils (And Advantages) Of Relaxing Assumptions When Measuring ψmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples include work that experimentally manipulated acoustic signals perceived by field crickets, where the presence or absence of the signal in nature is known to be controlled by a naturally segregating variant (Bailey and Zuk 2012;Pascoal et al 2016). Technical innovations in other systems might facilitate such an approach when information about the genetic basis of traits is known or estimable, and include techniques such as video behavioral playbacks in fish such as the guppy Poecilia reticulata (Woo and Rieucau 2011), electromechanically-controlled sexual signaling behavior in robotic neotropical frogs (Crossodactylus schmidti) (Caldart et al 2020), robotic sage grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus) in which variation in female sexual receptivity can be simulated (Perry et al 2019), or experimentally manipulated body marks (Velando et al 2013). associated with large partner larvae and vice versa.…”
Section: Perils (And Advantages) Of Relaxing Assumptions When Measuring ψmentioning
confidence: 99%