2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.lingua.2010.09.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Function word erosion which is not a frequency effect: On exemplars and prosodic paradigm levelling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 36 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Focal words were lenited less than nonfocal words were, as expected given previous findings that function words are especially prone to phonological reduction (Round, 2011). In this case, I hypothesize that focal words were somewhat protected from lenition because their status as the target of elicitation word led speakers to use more effort in their articulation.…”
Section: P/k Lenition In Murrinh Pathasupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Focal words were lenited less than nonfocal words were, as expected given previous findings that function words are especially prone to phonological reduction (Round, 2011). In this case, I hypothesize that focal words were somewhat protected from lenition because their status as the target of elicitation word led speakers to use more effort in their articulation.…”
Section: P/k Lenition In Murrinh Pathasupporting
confidence: 84%